Research Background: Mining is fundamental to economic development because it supplies minerals and raw materials required for infrastructure, manufacturing, energy production, transportation, construction, and emerging technologies. However, conventional mining practices are frequently associated with land degradation, deforestation, biodiversity loss, soil erosion, excessive water consumption, contamination of surface and groundwater, dust generation, greenhouse-gas emissions, and large volumes of mine waste. These environmental pressures may also create significant public-health concerns for mine workers and surrounding communities through exposure to particulate matter, heavy metals, contaminated water, noise, and occupational hazards. Sustainable mining therefore requires an integrated approach that balances mineral production and economic benefits with environmental protection, resource efficiency, worker safety, community health, and social responsibility. Research Problem / Research Gap: Although mining companies increasingly adopt environmental management systems, cleaner technologies, waste-management strategies, mine rehabilitation, renewable energy, and corporate social responsibility programmes, considerable variation remains in their implementation and effectiveness. Existing studies often examine environmental pollution, occupational health, mining technology, or community impacts separately. Comparatively fewer empirical studies integrate sustainable mining practices, environmental protection, and public-health outcomes within a single analytical framework. Furthermore, evidence is required regarding which sustainable practices have the greatest potential to simultaneously reduce ecological damage and health risks. Research Objectives: The study aims to assess the contribution of sustainable mining practices to environmental protection and public health. Specifically, it seeks to examine the effects of pollution-control practices, sustainable water management, mine-waste management, cleaner and energy-efficient technologies, land rehabilitation, occupational health and safety practices, and community engagement on environmental and health outcomes. It also aims to identify implementation barriers and recommend strategies for strengthening sustainability within the mining sector. Methodology: The proposed study will adopt a quantitative, cross-sectional empirical research design, supported where appropriate by qualitative observations. Primary data may be collected from approximately 200 respondents, including mining employees, managers, environmental and safety personnel, healthcare/public-health professionals, and members of mining-affected communities. A structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale will measure major study constructs. Secondary information may be obtained from peer-reviewed literature, government reports, environmental assessments, and mining sustainability reports. Data analysis may include descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, correlation analysis, multiple regression, ANOVA, and, where appropriate, structural equation modelling (SEM). Expected Key Findings: The study is expected to demonstrate that effective pollution control, responsible water use, scientific mine-waste management, cleaner technology, land restoration, strong occupational safety systems, and community participation are positively associated with environmental protection and improved public-health outcomes. Strong environmental governance and regulatory compliance are also expected to enhance these relationships. Research Implications: The research may provide evidence for mining companies, policymakers, environmental regulators, public-health authorities, and local communities regarding the development of integrated mining sustainability strategies. It may support a transition from compliance-oriented environmental management toward preventive, technology-enabled, health-sensitive, and community-inclusive mining practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sohini Roy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: