Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction of iodinated contrast into the intact colon is not expected to result in imaging-visible renal excretion of this contrast and is a phenomenon that has only rarely been described. We present a case in which such vicarious renal excretion was misinterpreted as a recto-vesical fistula which resulted in unnecessary delay in the patient's management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Low et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: