Key result
Acute hypoxia reduces phase I cardiac output and oxygen delivery amplitudes during exercise vs normoxia.
Why the study?
The study tested the hypothesis that vagal withdrawal plays a role in the rapid phase I cardiopulmonary response to exercise.
Hypoxia blunts early HR and CO responses during moderate exercise; leaves open effects on exercise tolerance and adaptation in clinical or altitude settings.
We tested the hypothesis that vagal withdrawal plays a role in the rapid (phase I) cardiopulmonary response to exercise. To this aim, in five men (24.6+/-3.4 yr, 82.1+/-13.7 kg, maximal aerobic power 330+/-67 W), we determined beat-by-beat cardiac output (Q), oxygen delivery (QaO2), and breath-by-breath lung oxygen uptake (VO2) at light exercise (50 and 100 W) in normoxia and acute hypoxia (fraction of inspired O2=0.11), because the latter reduces resting vagal activity. We computed Q from stroke volume (Qst, by model flow) and heart rate (fH, electrocardiography), and QaO2 from Q and arterial O2 concentration. Double exponentials were fitted to the data. In hypoxia compared with normoxia, steady-state fH and Q were higher, and Qst and VO2 were unchanged. QaO2 was unchanged at rest and lower at exercise. During transients, amplitude of phase I (A1) for VO2 was unchanged. For fH, Q and QaO2, A1 was lower. Phase I time constant (tau1) for QaO2 and VO2 was unchanged. The same was the case for Q at 100 W and for fH at 50 W. Qst kinetics were unaffected. In conclusion, the results do not fully support the hypothesis that vagal withdrawal determines phase I, because it was not completely suppressed. Although we can attribute the decrease in A1 of fH to a diminished degree of vagal withdrawal in hypoxia, this is not so for Qst. Thus the dual origin of the phase I of Q and QaO2, neural (vagal) and mechanical (venous return increase by muscle pump action), would rather be confirmed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lador et al. (2008) studied Cardiopulmonary response to light exercise in acute normobaric hypoxia (n=5). Acute normobaric hypoxia during light exercise (50 and 100 W) vs. Normoxia during light exercise (50 and 100 W) was evaluated on Phase I dynamics of cardiac output (Q), systemic oxygen delivery (QaO2), and lung oxygen uptake (VO2) at exercise onset. Acute hypoxia (FiO2=0.11) during 50 and 100 W exercise lowered phase I amplitude for heart rate, cardiac output, and O2 delivery vs normoxia without altering stroke volume kinetics or VO2 amplitude.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: