Key result
Posterolateral delay on tissue synchronization imaging is linked to ~9-point higher LVEF gain post-CRT.
Why the study?
Tissue synchronization imaging often demonstrates dyssynchrony patterns other than lateral delay in patients evaluated for CRT, and the prevalence of these patterns and their relationship with reverse remodeling in response to CRT had not been well described.
Cohort (n=32)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TSI patterns beyond lateral delay may inform CRT selection; leaves open whether they predict reverse remodeling in prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Tissue synchronization imaging (TSI), a parametric imaging technique based on tissue velocity imaging, often demonstrates patterns other than lateral delay in patients evaluated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The prevalence of these patterns and their response to CRT has not been well described. We hypothesized that regional patterns of dyssynchrony might correlate with the extent of reverse remodeling. METHODS: A consecutive series of 32 patients underwent echocardiographic study prior to CRT implant and 3 months postimplant. TSI was used to color-code the time-to-peak positive systolic velocity at six basal and six mid-LV segments. Each patient was assigned to one of four groups based on the predominant location of greatest delay (≥ 2 segments): (1) posterolateral delay, (2) septal delay, (3) no dyssynchrony, or (4) other. RESULTS: Patients were classified as follows: posterolateral delay in 44% of patients (n = 14), septal delay in 28% (n = 9), no dyssynchrony in 16% (n = 5), and other pattern in 13% (n = 4). At 3-month follow-up, the group with the lateral delay pattern was associated with the greatest decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and the largest improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (-45 mL and +9.3%, respectively, P < 0.05). The LVESV in the other three groups changed as follows: -24 mL (septal), -28 mL (no dyssynchrony), and -15 mL (other). Similar trends were observed for LVEF and left ventricular end-diastolic volume. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the presence of wide QRS and a left bundle branch block, the most delayed segment is not always the posterolateral wall. Posterolateral delay is associated with the best response to CRT, while other patterns respond at a lower magnitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Mara et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Heart failure / dyssynchrony undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=32). Posterolateral delay pattern on tissue synchronization imaging prior to CRT vs. Septal delay, no dyssynchrony, or other dyssynchrony patterns was evaluated on Change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 3 months (p=<0.05). Posterolateral delay on tissue synchronization imaging yielded the greatest LVESV reduction (-45 mL) and LVEF gain (+9.3%) at 3 months post-CRT (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: