Key result
AVR is linked to ~15% higher myocardial perfusion reserve at 6-12 months in severe AS.
Why the study?
Although aortic valve replacement leads to reverse cardiac remodeling in severe aortic stenosis, the degree and determinants of changes in myocardial perfusion after valve replacement and their link with exercise capacity remained to be defined.
Does surgical aortic valve replacement improve myocardial perfusion and aerobic exercise capacity in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=50)
Single-blind
No
Does surgical aortic valve replacement improve myocardial perfusion and aerobic exercise capacity in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis significantly improves stress myocardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion reserve—especially in those with the worst baseline perfusion—and the degree of perfusion reserve improvement correlates with gains in peak aerobic exercise capacity (VO2).
AVR-associated perfusion gains in severe AS support further study of exercise links; leaves open impact on outcomes or practice change.
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) leads to reverse cardiac remodeling in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this secondary pooled analysis was to assess the degree and determinants of changes in myocardial perfusion post AVR, and its link with exercise capacity, in patients with severe AS. A total of 68 patients underwent same-day echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with adenosine stress pre and 6–12 months post-AVR. Of these, 50 had matched perfusion data available (age 67 ± 8 years, 86% male, aortic valve peak velocity 4.38 ± 0.63m/s, aortic valve area index 0.45 ± 0.13cm2/m2). A subgroup of 34 patients underwent a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) to assess maximal exercise capacity (peak VO2). Baseline and post-AVR parameters were compared and linear regression was used to determine associations between baseline variables and change in myocardial perfusion and exercise capacity. Following AVR, stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) increased from 1.56 ± 0.52 mL/min/g to 1.80 ± 0.62 mL/min/g (p < 0.001), with a corresponding 15% increase in myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) (2.04 ± 0.57 to 2.34 ± 0.68; p = 0.004). Increasing severity of AS, presence of late gadolinium enhancement, lower baseline stress MBF and MPR were associated with a greater improvement in MPR post-AVR. On multivariable analysis low baseline MPR was independently associated with increased MPR post-AVR. There was no significant change in peak VO2 post-AVR, but a significant increase in exercise duration. Change in MPR was associated with change in peak VO2 post AVR (r = 0.346, p = 0.045). Those with the most impaired stress MBF and MPR at baseline demonstrate the greatest improvements in these parameters following AVR and the magnitude of change in MPR correlated with improvement in peak VO2, the gold standard measure of aerobic exercise capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aslam et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=50). Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) vs. Pre-AVR baseline was evaluated on Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) (p=0.004). Aortic valve replacement increased myocardial perfusion reserve by 15% (2.04 to 2.34, p=0.004) and stress myocardial blood flow (1.56 to 1.80 mL/min/g, p<0.001) at 6-12 months in severe AS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: