Key result
Significant non-infarct-related LMCAD in AMI patients undergoing culprit-lesion PCI was associated with a higher risk of 12-month MACE (HR 2.189; 95% CI 1.230-3.896; P=0.008).
Why the study?
Infarct-related left main coronary artery disease is associated with increased cardiac mortality in AMI, but the prevalence and prognostic impact of significant (≥50% stenosis) non-infarct-related LMCAD in AMI patients had not yet been elucidated.
Cohort (n=7,655)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-infarct LMCAD flags higher 12-month MACE risk after culprit PCI in AMI; leaves open whether LM intervention improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Infarct-related left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is associated with an increased cardiac mortality in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the prevalence and prognostic impact of significant (≥50% stenosis) non-infarct-related LMCAD in patients with AMI have not yet been elucidated. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 7655 AMI patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry from November 2005 to January 2008. We compared major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in AMI patients with non-infarct-related LMCAD and those without LMCAD. RESULTS: Of 99 (1.3%) non-infarct-related LMCAD patients, 40 patients had undergone PCI due to their lesions on the left main coronary artery. The incidences of all-cause death, cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and composite of MACE except repeat revascularization were higher in patients with non-infarct-related LMCAD at 12 months. In Cox proportional hazard analysis for the prediction of MACE at 12 months, the hazard ratio of LMCAD was 2.189 (95% confidence interval 1.230-3.896, P=0.008). In subgroup analysis, there was no significant cumulative difference between patients who had undergone non-infarct-related left main coronary artery PCI and those who did not undergo PCI at 1 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: The significant, non-infarct-related LMCAD in patients with AMI remains a major adverse prognostic indicator even after receiving optimal culprit-lesion PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=7,655). Significant (≥50% stenosis) non-infarct-related left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) vs. AMI patients without LMCAD was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 12 months (HR 2.189, 95% CI 1.230-3.896, p=0.008). Significant non-infarct-related LMCAD in AMI patients undergoing culprit-lesion PCI was associated with a higher risk of 12-month MACE (HR 2.189; 95% CI 1.230-3.896; P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: