Key result
AI-enabled ECG detects pulmonary hypertension with ~0.85 summary AUC across pooled studies.
Why the study?
Pulmonary hypertension is frequently diagnosed late because its early manifestations are nonspecific, and artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography may offer a scalable method to identify patients who warrant further evaluation.
Does artificial intelligence-enabled 12-lead electrocardiography accurately detect pulmonary hypertension compared to invasive hemodynamic or echocardiographic reference standards?
Meta-Analysis (n=103,884)
Does artificial intelligence-enabled 12-lead electrocardiography accurately detect pulmonary hypertension compared to invasive hemodynamic or echocardiographic reference standards?
AI-enabled 12-lead ECG demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.85, sensitivity 81%, specificity 80%) for pulmonary hypertension and may serve as a scalable tool for targeted case finding.
Pulmonary hypertension is frequently diagnosed late because its early manifestations are nonspecific. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography may provide a scalable method for identifying patients who warrant further evaluation. We searched eight databases from inception through May 2026 without language restrictions for studies evaluating artificial intelligence or machine-learning algorithms applied to standard 12-lead electrocardiograms against invasive hemodynamic or echocardiographic reference standards. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251149532). Five retrospective studies comprising 103,884 individuals were included. Pooled sensitivity was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.82), pooled specificity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), and the summary area under the curve was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88). The positive likelihood ratio was 4.03 (95% CI, 3.38-4.80), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.23-0.26). At a pretest probability of 20%, positive and negative results corresponded to posttest probabilities of approximately 50% and 6%, respectively. Heterogeneity was substantial, but leave-one-out analyses did not materially alter pooled estimates. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography showed good performance for detecting pulmonary hypertension and may support targeted case finding. Prospective studies should determine whether its use improves diagnostic pathways and patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
EDJIMBI et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Pulmonary hypertension (n=103,884). Artificial intelligence-enabled 12-lead electrocardiography vs. Invasive hemodynamic or echocardiographic reference standards was evaluated on Diagnostic performance for detecting pulmonary hypertension (sensitivity, specificity, and summary AUC) (AUC 0.85 (Sensitivity 0.81, Specificity 0.80), 95% CI 0.81-0.88). AI-enabled ECG detected pulmonary hypertension with a pooled sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.82), specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), and summary AUC of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: