Key result
Electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for heart failure, achieving an area under the curve of 0.986, a pooled sensitivity of 0.95, and specificity of 0.98.
Why the study?
The study aimed to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis on the application of artificial intelligence for heart failure detection based on the ECG.
Does artificial intelligence applied to ECG data accurately diagnose heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=104,737)
Does artificial intelligence applied to ECG data accurately diagnose heart failure?
Artificial intelligence applied to ECG demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for detecting heart failure, though current studies have significant heterogeneity and risk of bias.
BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is an inexpensive and easily accessible investigation for the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases including heart failure (HF). The application of artificial intelligence (AI) has contributed to clinical practice in terms of aiding diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification and guiding clinical management. The aim of this study is to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published studies on the application of AI for HF detection based on the ECG. METHODS: We searched Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify literature using AI for HF detection based on ECG data. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Random-effects models were used for calculating the effect estimates and hierarchical receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted. Subgroup analysis was performed. Heterogeneity and the risk of bias were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies including 104,737 subjects were included. The area under the curve for HF diagnosis was 0.986, with a corresponding pooled sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98), specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) and diagnostic odds ratio of 831.51 (95% CI: 127.85-5407.74). In the patient selection domain of QUADAS-2, eight studies were designated as high risk. CONCLUSIONS: According to the available evidence, the incorporation of AI can aid the diagnosis of HF. However, there is heterogeneity among machine learning algorithms and improvements are required in terms of quality and study design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=104,737). Electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence vs. Clinical diagnosis of heart failure was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for heart failure (DOR 831.51, 95% CI 127.85-5407.74). Electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for heart failure, achieving an area under the curve of 0.986, a pooled sensitivity of 0.95, and specificity of 0.98.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: