Key result
Artificial intelligence models analyzing ECG data accurately detected heart failure, achieving a pooled sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.95, and a diagnostic odds ratio of 303.65.
Why the study?
Recent advancements in AI offer a promising avenue to improve diagnostic precision using ECG data, prompting a synthesis of current evidence on AI model performance for detecting heart failure.
Do AI models using ECG data accurately detect heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Meta-Analysis (n=218,202)
Do AI models using ECG data accurately detect heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Odds Ratio: 303.65 (95% CI 53.12–1734)
AI models analyzing ECG data demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for detecting heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, highlighting their potential as reliable, noninvasive screening tools.
Heart failure (HF) is the most common cause of death worldwide, characterized by low ejection fraction, substantial mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present a promising avenue for enhancing diagnostic precision, particularly in the analysis of electrocardiogram (ECG) data. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to synthesize current evidence on the diagnostic performance of AI models in detecting HF using ECG data. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from inception up to July 1, 2023, to identify original articles assessing the predictive ability of AI in HF diagnosis. A total of 218,202 participants were included, with individual studies ranging from 59 to 110,000 participants. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for the 13 included studies, with a 97.5% confidence interval (CI), were 0.93 (CI: 0.81-0.98), 0.95 (CI: 0.89-0.97), and 303.65 (CI: 53.12-1734), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.12 to 1.00 and 0.66 to 1.00, respectively, indicating substantial variability in AI model performance, which may impact their generalizability and clinical reliability. AI-based algorithms utilizing ECG data are a reliable, accurate, and promising tool for the screening, detection, and monitoring of HF. However, further prospective studies are needed, particularly randomized controlled trials and large-scale longitudinal studies across diverse populations, to evaluate the long-term clinical impact, generalizability, and real-world applicability of these AI-driven diagnostic tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=218,202). Artificial intelligence models using ECG data vs. Standard diagnostic methods (echocardiogram, biomarkers, clinical diagnosis) was evaluated on Diagnostic odds ratio for detecting heart failure (DOR 303.65, 95% CI 53.12-1734). Artificial intelligence models analyzing ECG data accurately detected heart failure, achieving a pooled sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.95, and a diagnostic odds ratio of 303.65.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: