Why the study?
To provide an overview of AI use in heart failure detection from ECG signals and to perform a meta-analysis of available studies.
Does artificial intelligence processing of ECG signals accurately detect heart failure or reduced LVEF?
Does artificial intelligence processing of ECG signals accurately detect heart failure or reduced LVEF?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Artificial intelligence algorithms can accurately detect heart failure and reduced ejection fraction from standard ECG signals, though performance is lower in real-world patient-level data compared to artificial datasets.
Introduction: Electrocardiography (ECG) is a quick and easily accessible method for diagnosis and screening of cardiovascular diseases including heart failure (HF). Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used for semi-automated ECG analysis. The aim of this evaluation was to provide an overview of AI use in HF detection from ECG signals and to perform a meta-analysis of available studies. Methods and Results: An independent comprehensive search of the PubMed and Google Scholar database was conducted for articles dealing with the ability of AI to predict HF based on ECG signals. Only original articles published in peer-reviewed journals were considered. A total of five reports including 57,027 patients and 579,134 ECG datasets were identified including two sets of patient-level data and three with ECG-based datasets. The AI-processed ECG data yielded areas under the receiver operator characteristics curves between 0.92 and 0.99 to identify HF with higher values in ECG-based datasets. Applying a random-effects model, an sROC of 0.987 was calculated. Using the contingency tables led to diagnostic odds ratios ranging from 3.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.12–3.76] to 13.61 (95% CI = 13.14–14.08) also with lower values in patient-level datasets. The meta-analysis diagnostic odds ratio was 7.59 (95% CI = 5.85–9.34). Conclusions: The present meta-analysis confirms the ability of AI to predict HF from standard 12-lead ECG signals underlining the potential of such an approach. The observed overestimation of the diagnostic ability in artificial ECG databases compared to patient-level data stipulate the need for robust prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grün et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: