Why the study?
Although BMI is linked to major outcomes in heart failure via the obesity paradox, whether a similar association between BMI, disease severity, and adverse outcomes exists in HCM remained uncertain.
Does body mass index category impact disease severity and the risk of major adverse clinical outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=545)
No
Does body mass index category impact disease severity and the risk of major adverse clinical outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, BMI extremes (underweight and moderate-to-severe obesity) are associated with a U-shaped increase in the risk of worsened clinical markers and major cardiovascular outcomes, primarily driven by all-cause mortality.
BMI extremes were associated with higher events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating for weight management trials and extends obesity paradox observations.
Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a primary myocardial disease that may be associated with worsened prognosis in the presence of other comorbidities. Body mass index (BMI) has been linked to major outcomes in heart hailure – the so-called obesity paradox. However, whether a similar pattern of association is observed in HCM remains uncertain. Objective To assess whether BMI is linked to disease severity and adverse outcomes in HCM. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients with HCM diagnosis followed at a tertiary center. Patients were categorized according to BMI class into 6 groups: underweight (BMI < 20 kg/m²), normal weight (BMI 20-24,9 kg/m²), pre-obesity (BMI 25-29,9 kg/m²), class I (BMI 30-34,9 kg/m²), class II(BMI 35-39,9 kg/m²) and class III obesity (BMI >40 kg/m²). Patients aged over 16 years and with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, heart transplantation and all-cause death. Survival analysis was assessed by Kaplan–Meier curves. Results A total of 545 HCM patients were included (mean age 66 ± 15 years; 57% male; mean BMI 27.4 ± 4.7 Kg/m2). Patients were distributed across BMI categories as follows: underweight (17 [3%]); normal weight (153 [28%]); pre-obesity (235 [43%]); class I(107 [20%]); class II(22 [4%]) and class III obesity (11 [2%]). BMI extremes were associated with more syncope (11.8 vs 15.7 vs 6.0 vs 6.5 vs 13.6 vs 9.1%; p= 0.045); higher median NT proBNP levels (2864 vs 1488 vs 540 vs 1371 vs 1090 vs 1691 pg/mL; p= 0.006); greater mean maximum left ventricular wall thickness (18.5 vs 17.5 vs 17.3 vs17.4 vs 18.3 vs 18 mm; p= 0.049); and more frequent apical aneurysm (0% vs 1.3% vs 4.3% vs 1.9% vs 13.6% vs 27.3%; p<0.001), respectively (central figure). No significant differences on other clinical or ecocardiographic markers were noted. Over a median follow-up of 4 (2-8) years, 91 (17%) patients reached the primary composite endpoint. Underweight and severe obesity were significantly associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome (41.2 vs 20.3 vs 14.0 vs 13.1 vs 18.2 vs 18.2%; p=0.031; respectively), mainly due a higher risk of death (29.4 vs. 13.7 vs. 11.1 vs. 10.3 vs. 9.1 vs. 18.2%, p=0.031). Conclusions In a contemporary HCM cohort, BMI extremes were associated with a worsened clinical profile and a higher risk of major cardiovascular outcomes. We observed a "U-shaped" risk pattern across BMI categories, suggesting that targeted weight management interventions in underweight and moderate-to-severe obese patients could confer HCM-related benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montalvao et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=545). Body mass index extremes (underweight <20 kg/m² to class III obesity >40 kg/m²) vs. Normal weight (BMI 20-24.9 kg/m²) and pre-obesity/class I obesity was evaluated on Composite of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, heart transplantation, and all-cause death (p=0.031).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: