Why the study?
Clinical data on ventricular arrhythmia ablation using a contact force-sensing focal catheter capable of delivering both radiofrequency and pulsed field energy are limited.
Does sequential radiofrequency and pulsed field ablation with a contact force-sensing focal catheter provide safe and effective treatment for patients with ventricular arrhythmias?
Does sequential radiofrequency and pulsed field ablation with a contact force-sensing focal catheter provide safe and effective treatment for patients with ventricular arrhythmias?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Initial clinical experience demonstrates that sequential radiofrequency and pulsed field ablation using a single contact force-sensing focal catheter is feasible, safe, and achieves high acute procedural success in patients with ventricular arrhythmias.
Background. Clinical data on ventricular ablation with a contact force-sensing focal catheter capable of delivering both radiofrequency (RF) and pulsed field (PF) energy are limited. Objective. To describe the procedural characteristics, acute efficacy, and safety of dual-energy ablation with the Dual Energy THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF (DE-STSF) catheter in consecutive patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Methods. This observational single-center study included all consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) with the DE-STSF catheter between June and October 2026. Results. Twenty-six patients were included (median age 65.5 [55.8-71.0] years; 77% male; median left ventricular ejection fraction 44.0% [30.0-53.8]). Eighteen underwent VT ablation, including 10 with electrical storm or incessant VT and 6 with prior VT ablation; 8 underwent PVC ablation. All patients received RF followed by PF consolidation. Noninducibility of any sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation was achieved in 16/18 VT patients (89%), and acute PVC elimination in all 8 PVC patients. No major procedure-related complications were documented during hospitalization. During a median follow-up of 68 [47-82] days, VT recurred in 2 patients; of whom one patient underwent repeat endocardial and epicardial ablation. No PVC recurrences were documented. Conclusion. In this initial clinical experience, sequential RF and PF ablation using a single contact force-sensing catheter proved feasible for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, achieving high acute success with a favorable early safety profile. Whether PF consolidation confers incremental benefit beyond RF ablation alone warrants prospective comparative evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: