Why the study?
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and filling pressure remains time- and expertise-dependent, motivating evaluation of the performance and prognostic significance of AI-enabled echocardiography for LVDD grading.
Does artificial intelligence-enabled echocardiography using only apical four-chamber videos without Doppler imaging accurately grade left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and predict all-cause mortality and heart failure-related events compared to contemporary echocardiographic guidelines and invasive measurements?
Does artificial intelligence-enabled echocardiography using only apical four-chamber videos without Doppler imaging accurately grade left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and predict all-cause mortality and heart failure-related events compared to contemporary echocardiographic guidelines and invasive measurements?
An AI-enabled echocardiography model using only single-view 2D videos without Doppler accurately grades left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and strongly predicts mortality and heart failure events, enabling simplified assessment in both standard and point-of-care ultrasound settings.
AI-predicted filling pressure may aid mortality risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background Assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and filling pressure is standard in echocardiography but remains time- and expertise-dependent. We evaluated the performance and prognostic significance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled echocardiography for LVDD grading. Methods An AI model was developed to classify four grades of LVDD using only apical four-chamber transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) videos without Doppler imaging acquired between 2012 and 2023. Model performance was assessed against contemporary echocardiographic grading guidelines and invasive measurements, and further evaluated in a prospective point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) cohort acquired by non-cardiologists (Trial number NCT05455541). Associations between model outputs and mortality and heart failure (HF)-related events were examined. Results The study included 120,649 TTEs from 90,967 patients (mean age 62.9±17.2 years; 43.1% female). In a hold-out test cohort of 23,952 patients, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.888 for detecting both ≥grade 1 and ≥grade 2 LVDD (elevated filling pressure), and 0.960 for grade 3 LVDD. Validation against invasive measurements in 124 patients yielded an AUC of 0.851. Over a median follow-up of 7 years (interquartile range 4.5-10), 35% died and 12.6% experienced HF-related events. Model-predicted elevated filling pressure was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.46–1.64, p<0.001) and HF-related events (subdistribution hazard ratio 2.65, 95% CI 2.42–2.89, p<0.001). Consistent diagnostic and prognostic performance was observed in the prospective POCUS cohort. Conclusions AI-enabled echocardiography demonstrated accurate LVDD grading and showed strong associations with clinical outcomes, supporting its potential integration into routine TTE and POCUS practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loutati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: