Why the study?
Echocardiography-based assessment of diastolic function in adult congenital heart disease is challenging due to complex anatomy and heterogenous physiology.
Does an AI-enabled ECG model accurately grade diastolic dysfunction and predict mortality in patients with adult congenital heart disease?
Does an AI-enabled ECG model accurately grade diastolic dysfunction and predict mortality in patients with adult congenital heart disease?
An AI-enabled ECG model can noninvasively grade diastolic dysfunction, correlating with invasive hemodynamics and independently predicting mortality in adult congenital heart disease.
AI-ECG may aid diastolic grading in ACHD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
BACKGROUND: Echocardiography-based assessment of diastolic function in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) is challenging owing to complex anatomy and heterogenous physiology. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study was to evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) (AI-ECG) model for grading diastolic dysfunction in patients with ACHD and assess its correlation with echocardiographic, invasive hemodynamic, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed 6,741 patients from the Mayo Clinic ACHD Registry (median age 37 years, 49% female) followed from 2000 to 2023. The median follow-up was 10 (5-15) years. Using a validated deep neural network (trained on 98,736 ECG-echocardiogram pairs), we assigned an AI-ECG diastolic grade (0-3) to the earliest ECG within 12 months of the index visit. We evaluated associations with echocardiography, hemodynamics, and mortality using nonparametric tests, correlation, Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression, and model performance for detecting elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP). RESULTS: The AI-ECG classified diastolic function as grade 0 in 65.8%, grade 1 in 4.0%, grade 2 in 19.7%, and grade 3 in 10.5%. Higher grades were associated with older age, greater CHD complexity, and more comorbidities including heart failure (6.7% vs 24.8%), diabetes, and cirrhosis (all P < 0.001). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide rose with each grade (129 [60-304] to 763 [311-1,915] pg/mL; P < 0.001). AI-ECG pressure estimates correlated with left atrial strain (ρ = -0.52) and right ventricular strain (ρ = -0.50). Invasive hemodynamics followed similar patterns; right atrial pressure rose from 8 (6-11) to 13 (10-18) mm Hg, and wedge pressure from 11 (8-14) to 16 (12-21) mm Hg (P < 0.001). Survival differed by grade (log-rank P < 0.0001); grades 2 and 3 independently predicted mortality (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.09-1.75; HR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.27-2.08). The model discriminated pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≥20 mm Hg with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: AI-ECG diastolic grading correlates with echocardiographic and invasive measures of cardiac filling pressures and independently predicts mortality in ACHD. These findings support its utility as a scalable, noninvasive risk stratification tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Sullivan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: