Why the study?
Recent studies suggest lipoprotein(a) may rise after acute myocardial infarction so peri-infarct values may not reflect steady-state levels, but the temporal profile and persistence of these changes beyond 6 months after ACS remain poorly characterized.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lp(a) levels rise sharply after acute coronary syndrome and only partially normalize by 12 months, indicating that peri-infarct measurements may substantially underestimate a patient's true long-term Lp(a)-mediated cardiovascular risk.
Background Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal, largely genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and residual risk after LDL-cholesterol lowering. Contrary to the traditional assumption of lifelong stability, several recent studies suggest that Lp(a) may rise after acute myocardial infarction, and that peri-infarct values may not reflect subsequent steady-state levels. However, the temporal profile and persistence of these changes beyond 6 months after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain poorly characterized. Purpose To characterise individual and categorical trajectories of Lp(a) from index ACS admission to 1 month and 12 months, and to determine whether post-ACS Lp(a) elevations persist over time. Methods We retrospectively included consecutive ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at a tertiary cardiac centre (2022–2025) with Lp(a) measured at index admission, 1 month, and 12 months. Lp(a) was quantified in mg/dL and categorised as <30, 30–50, 50–70, and >70 mg/dL. Individual longitudinal trajectories were visualised with alluvial plots, and changes in median Lp(a) and risk-category distribution were assessed using paired non-parametric tests. Results Among 338 patients (mean age 61.3 ± 10.6 years, 81.3% male), median Lp(a) increased from 31.9 mg/dL at baseline to 64.3 mg/dL at 1 month, followed by partial decline to 53.2 mg/dL at 12 months (p<0.001 for trend). The proportion with Lp(a) >70 mg/dL almost doubled from 22.5% at baseline to 46.2% at 1 month and remained markedly elevated at 38.8% at 12 months. Conversely, patients with Lp(a) <30 mg/dL fell from 47.9% at baseline to 22.2% at 1 month, with only partial recovery to 29.6% after 12 months. Alluvial plots revealed substantial interindividual heterogeneity but showed that a large subset transitioned from low to persistently high Lp(a) categories. Conclusions Lp(a) rises sharply after ACS, peaks around 1 month, and shows only incomplete normalisation at 12 months, indicating that peri-infarct measurements substantially underestimate the proportion of patients with sustained high Lp(a). These data support a paradigm in which ACS unmasks genetically mediated Lp(a) risk through an acute-phase response that only partially wanes over time, with potential implications for timing of Lp(a) testing, risk stratification, and selection for emerging Lp(a)-lowering therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahajan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: