Key result
Perioperative SGLT2 inhibitors reduce acute kidney injury ~48% in cardiac surgery patients.
Why the study?
Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at increased risk of acute kidney injury and cardiac arrhythmias, and the perioperative impact of SGLT2i remained unclear due to limited and heterogeneous evidence.
Does perioperative use of SGLT2 inhibitors reduce acute kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmias, and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,234)
Does perioperative use of SGLT2 inhibitors reduce acute kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmias, and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Perioperative use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is associated with a significant reduction in acute kidney injury without a significant impact on cardiac arrhythmias, ketoacidosis, or mortality.
Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated cardiovascular and renal protective effects in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease, beyond their glucose-lowering properties. In the perioperative setting of cardiac surgery, patients are at increased risk of complications such as cardiac arrhythmias and acute kidney injury (AKI), both of which are associated with worse short and long term outcomes. In this context, new studies have shown benefits of this use, including the association with reduced rates of acute kidney injury and cardiac arrhythmias. However, their impact in the perioperative period remains unclear due to limited and heterogeneous evidence. Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of perioperative use of SGLT2i in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched through February 2026 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or usual care. Eligible studies reported outcomes such as AKI, cardiac arrhythmias, ketoacidosis, and mortality. The results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and were estimated using a random-effects model with the Restricted Maximum Likelihood estimator. All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.4.2). Results Four RCTs, comprising 1,234 participants, of whom 613 (49.6%) were assigned to SGLT2i, were included. The mean age was 64.7 years, with approximately 40% having diabetes. The most commonly performed surgery was coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Compared with controls, SGLT2i significantly reduced the incidence of AKI (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.44, 0.62; P < 0.05; I² = 0%). There were no significant differences between groups in arrhythmia (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.71, 1.81; P = 0.59; I² = 0%), ketoacidosis (RR 3.63; 95% CI 0.50, 26.44; P = 0.2; I² = 0%), and mortality (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.03, 15.65; P = 0.82; I² = 52%). Conclusion In this meta-analysis, the perioperative use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients undergoing cardiac surgery was associated with a significant reduction in acute kidney injury but did not demonstrate a significant impact on cardiac arrhythmias or mortality. These findings highlight a potent reno-protective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in this high-risk population without increasing major adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chagas et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Perioperative care of cardiac surgery (n=1,234). Perioperative SGLT2 inhibitors vs. Placebo or usual care was evaluated on Acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.44-0.62, p=<0.05). Perioperative SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery compared with controls (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.44-0.62; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: