Key result
Highest body roundness index linked to ~35% higher risk of major CVD events.
Why the study?
This study aimed to determine the impact of the body roundness index (BRI) on cardiovascular disease and mortality in Chinese adults.
Does a higher body roundness index (BRI) increase the risk of major cardiovascular disease events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in Chinese adults aged 35-70 years?
Cohort (n=45,864)
Yes
Does a higher body roundness index (BRI) increase the risk of major cardiovascular disease events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in Chinese adults aged 35-70 years?
In a large Chinese cohort, body roundness index (BRI) demonstrated a J-shaped association with major cardiovascular events and a U-shaped association with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, supporting its utility as an anthropometric marker for cardiometabolic risk stratification.
Background To determine the impact of body roundness index (BRI) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in Chinese adults. Methods The PURE-China study recruited 47,931 participants aged 35-70 years from 12 provinces of China between 2005 and 2009. The BRI was calculated based on height and waist circumference. The primary outcomes were major CVD events (stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or heart failure (HF)), CVD mortality, and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards frailty models and restricted cubic splines were used to analyze the associations between BRI and the primary outcomes. Results Among the 45,864 participants included in this study, we documented 2,659 deaths (including 960 CVD deaths) and 4,280 major CVD events (comprising 2,828 strokes, 1,134 MI, and 318 HF ) over a median follow-up of 11.9 years. In fully adjusted models, each standard deviation increment in BRI was associated with increased risks of major CVD events (HR=1.12, 95%CI: 1.04-1.20), stroke (HR=1.11, 95%CI: 1.07-1.16), and MI (HR=1.19, 95%CI: 1.12-1.27). Compared to the lowest BRI quartile, participants in the highest quartile exhibited significantly increased hazards of major CVD events (HR: 1.35; 95%CI: 1.21-1.51), stroke (HR: 1.32; 95%CI: 1.15-1.51), and MI (HR: 1.55; 95%CI: 1.25-1.92) in fully adjusted models. Restricted cubic spline analyses revealed J-shaped dose-response associations between BRI and major CVD events, myocardial infarction, as well as stroke, while U-shaped associations were observed for all-cause mortality and CVD mortality,with nadirs identified at BRI values of 3.27 and 3.01, respectively. These nonlinear relationships explained the non-significant associations in fully adjusted models when comparing the highest versus lowest BRI groups for all-cause mortality (HR: 0.96; 95%CI: 0.85-1.09) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.13; 95%CI: 0.91-1.41). In the low-BRI group, each SD increase was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR=0.86, 95%CI: 0.74-0.99) and CVD mortality (HR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.61-1.10). Conversely, in the high-BRI group, each SD increase predicted higher all-cause mortality (HR=1.15, 95%CI: 1.09-1.22) and CVD mortality (HR=1.27, 95%CI: 1.18-1.37). Conclusions BRI were significantly associated with the risk of CVD and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality (n=45,864). Body roundness index (BRI) vs. Lowest BRI quartile / per standard deviation increment was evaluated on Major cardiovascular disease (CVD) events (stroke, myocardial infarction, or heart failure), CVD mortality, and all-cause mortality (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.21-1.51). Body roundness index in the highest vs lowest quartile increased major CVD events (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.21-1.51) and showed U-shaped associations with all-cause and CVD mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: