Key result
Greater winter indoor-temperature variation linked to ~0.4 mmHg larger 5-year rise in systolic blood pressure.
Why the study?
Cold indoor temperatures acutely raise blood pressure, but the long-term effects of winter indoor-temperature levels and temporal variability on changes in home blood pressure remained uncertain.
Does greater winter indoor-temperature variability increase 5-year home blood pressure in community-dwelling Japanese adults?
Cohort (n=700)
Yes
Does greater winter indoor-temperature variability increase 5-year home blood pressure in community-dwelling Japanese adults?
Greater winter indoor-temperature variability is associated with larger 5-year increases in home blood pressure independently of mean indoor temperature, suggesting that thermal stability in the home environment is relevant to long-term blood pressure progression.
Indoor temperature variability may influence long-term BP progression; extends acute observations but leaves causality and interventions open.
Cold indoor temperatures acutely raise blood pressure, but their long-term effects remain uncertain. We investigated whether winter indoor-temperature levels and temporal variability were associated with 5-year changes in home blood pressure. This nationwide cohort included 700 adults from 483 households with complete data. Living-room temperature was measured at 10-min intervals, and home blood pressure was measured twice each morning and evening for 2 weeks in winter at baseline and at the 5-year follow-up. Linear mixed-effects models with household random intercepts were adjusted for baseline blood pressure, individual covariates, and mean indoor temperature in analyses of variability. Mean and minimum indoor temperatures were not associated with 5-year changes in systolic or diastolic home blood pressure. In contrast, a 10 °C/day higher cumulative indoor-temperature variation was associated with 0.42 mmHg (95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.80) and 0.27 mmHg (0.01–0.54) greater increases in systolic and diastolic home blood pressure, respectively. Each additional daily indoor-temperature swing ≥3 °C and ≥5 °C was associated with 0.32 mmHg (0.004–0.636) and 0.49 mmHg (0.04–0.93) greater increases in systolic blood pressure, respectively. A model-based comparison of cumulative indoor-temperature variation values 1 standard deviation above versus below the mean yielded an estimated difference of 1.47 mmHg (0.13–2.81) in the 5-year change in home systolic blood pressure. The sensitivity analysis yielded broadly consistent results. Greater winter indoor-temperature variability was associated with larger 5-year increases in home blood pressure independently of mean indoor temperature. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm . UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, Trial No. UMIN000042196.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Umishio et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Home blood pressure changes (n=700). Cumulative indoor-temperature variation (CITV, per 10 °C/day increase) vs. Lower indoor-temperature variability (continuous exposure) was evaluated on 5-year change in home systolic blood pressure (mmHg) (MD 0.42 mmHg per 10 °C/day, 95% CI 0.04-0.80, p=0.031). Each 10 °C/day higher cumulative winter indoor-temperature variation was associated with a 0.42 mmHg (95% CI 0.04–0.80; P=0.031) greater 5-year increase in home systolic blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: