Key result
Early cardiac rehabilitation after valve intervention is linked to ~27% lower 2-year major events.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation is an established component of secondary cardiovascular prevention, and its association with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac valve interventions remained to be evaluated.
Does initiation of cardiac rehabilitation within 2 months reduce the 2-year risk of composite events (death, myocardial infarction, and cerebral infarction) in patients undergoing transcatheter cardiac valve interventions?
Cohort (n=59,758)
Yes
Does initiation of cardiac rehabilitation within 2 months reduce the 2-year risk of composite events (death, myocardial infarction, and cerebral infarction) in patients undergoing transcatheter cardiac valve interventions?
Initiation of cardiac rehabilitation within 2 months after transcatheter cardiac valve interventions is associated with a 27% relative reduction in the 2-year composite risk of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke.
Background and objectives Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an established component of secondary cardiovascular prevention. The extent to which it benefits postoperative patients remains clinically important. Accordingly, we evaluated the association between CR and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing cardiac valve interventions. Methods The TriNetX global federated research network was used to identify patients undergoing cardiac valve interventions (transcatheter aortic, pulmonary, mitral, and tricuspid valve implantation or replacement) and to compare those who subsequently received CR within 2 months with those without documented CR. The primary outcomes were 2-year composite events (death, myocardial infarction and cerebral infarction). Secondary outcomes were heart failure (HF), incident atrial fibrillation, valve prosthesis complications and dementia. The analyses were conducted with a 1-month landmark period to minimise the influence of early events. Results Before propensity-score matching (PSM), cardiac intervention patients who underwent CR (N=3,158, age:77.2 ± 8.8, 58.4% male) were more often male and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, and diabetes mellitus, when compared with those who did not undergo CR (N=56,600, age: 76.7 ± 11.8, 56.6% male). After PSM (matched N=2,886), CR was associated with significantly lower 2-year risk of composite events (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65-0.82). In analyses restricted to aortic valve interventions, CR was associated with a lower 2-year risk of composite events (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.87) and heart failure (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47-0.87). Subgroup analyses stratified by age, sex, BMI and prior myocardial infarction, as well as sensitivity analysis of aortic valve interventions performed after 2020, were in line with the primary findings for composite events. Conclusion Among patients undergoing cardiac valve interventions, initiation of CR within 2 months was associated with significantly lower 2-year risks of composite events. These findings extend prior evidence supporting the effectiveness of CR in cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmadzadeh et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiac valve interventions (transcatheter aortic, pulmonary, mitral, and tricuspid valve implantation or replacement) (n=59,758). Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) within 2 months vs. No documented cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on 2-year composite events (death, myocardial infarction, and cerebral infarction) (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82). Cardiac rehabilitation initiated within 2 months of cardiac valve intervention was associated with a lower 2-year risk of death, MI, or stroke (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.65-0.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: