Key result
Higher allostatic load is linked to ~3.1-fold higher cardiovascular disease risk.
Why the study?
Allostatic load reflects cumulative multisystem biological dysregulation induced by chronic stress, but whether it predicts long-term risk across both arterial and venous vascular outcomes remained unclear.
Does higher allostatic load predict increased long-term risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease and unprovoked venous thromboembolism in adults aged ≥ 35 years free of baseline CVD and VTE?
Cohort (n=22,255)
Does higher allostatic load predict increased long-term risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease and unprovoked venous thromboembolism in adults aged ≥ 35 years free of baseline CVD and VTE?
Higher allostatic load, reflecting cumulative multisystem biological dysregulation, is strongly associated with an increased 13-year risk of both major arterial cardiovascular events (especially coronary heart disease) and unprovoked venous thromboembolism.
High allostatic load associated with elevated CVD hazard; supports further validation as risk marker but leaves open added predictive value.
Background Allostatic load (AL) reflects cumulative multisystem biological dysregulation induced by chronic stress exposure, capturing chronic physiological burden. Whether AL predicts long-term risk across arterial and venous vascular outcomes remains unclear. This study examined the association between AL and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a large population-based prospective cohort. Methods We analyzed 22,255 participants (aged ≥ 35 years; 53% women) free of CVD and VTE at baseline (2005-2010). Outcomes were fatal and non-fatal CVD, including 1447 events (1036 CHD, 235 ischemic stroke), and 108 unprovoked VTE during 13-year follow-up. AL was computed as the sum of standardized (z-score) biomarkers across cardiovascular (systolic/diastolic blood pressure, heart rate), inflammatory (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, WBC, albumin, glycoprotein acetyls), metabolic (total/HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, insulin, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein B), respiratory (FEV1, FVC) and renal markers (creatinine, cystatin C). After inversion of protective biomarkers, these were equally summed into a global AL index: higher values indicate greater biological dysregulation. Cox proportional models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), across AL quartiles, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. Results Participants in the highest AL quartile, compared with the first, had increased hazard of CVD (HR 3.14; 95% CI 2.53-3.90), strongest for CHD (4.54; 3.45-5.98). Association with ischemic stroke was weaker (1.92; 1.15-3.20). Higher AL was also associated with higher hazard of VTE (2.25; 1.11-4.54). Conclusions Higher AL was associated with an excess hazard major arterial of major arterial events, particularly CHD, and also extended to unprovoked VTE. Cumulative multisystem biological dysregulation may represent an integrative marker for vascular risk stratification. Key messages • Cumulative multisystem biological dysregulation, captured by allostatic load, identifies individuals at higher risk of cerebro-cardiovascular disease and unprovoked venous thromboembolism. • Allostatic load supports vascular risk stratification beyond traditional arterial outcomes, highlighting a shared long-term vulnerability across arterial and venous disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costanzo et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism (n=22,255). Highest quartile of allostatic load (AL) index vs. First (lowest) quartile of allostatic load (AL) index was evaluated on Fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) and unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) (HR 3.14, 95% CI 2.53-3.90). Higher allostatic load (highest vs first quartile) increased the hazard of cardiovascular disease (HR 3.14; 95% CI 2.53-3.90) and unprovoked VTE (HR 2.25; 95% CI 1.11-4.54).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: