Key result
Combined CVD and diabetes linked to ~210% higher odds of elevated allostatic load.
Why the study?
Allostatic load is suspected of contributing to health disparities, but its association with dual chronic conditions required determination.
Are cardiovascular disease and diabetes associated with high allostatic load?
Cross-Sectional (n=10,411)
Yes
Are cardiovascular disease and diabetes associated with high allostatic load?
Cardiovascular disease and diabetes, both individually and dually, are strongly associated with high allostatic load, highlighting the cumulative physiological burden of these chronic conditions.
Supports heightened vigilance for physiological stress in comorbid CVD and diabetes; leaves open whether targeting allostatic load improves outcomes.
Background: Allostatic load (AL) is defined as a cumulative burden of chronic stress and life events, which involves the interaction of different physiological systems at varying degrees of activity. AL is suspected of contributing to health disparities among different populations. Suppressed or overactive physiological systems can interrupt AL affecting proper tissue and organ function leading to disease. The objective of our study was to determine the association of AL with dual chronic conditions. Methods: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). For the current analysis, we used the data cycles of 2007–2010, which is the most recent data that collected comprehensive measures of the composite AL outcome variable. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable logistic regression, with stepwise forward variable selection method ( P < 0.05), were conducted using STATA/IC 15.0. Results: AL levels were high among 20% of the respondents ( n = 2179). Having a lower income to poverty ratio, being married, physical inactivity, experiencing sleep problems, and a history of smoking were significantly associated with high AL ( P < 0.05). Non-Hispanic blacks [odds ratio (OR): 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6–2.4] and Mexicans and other Hispanics (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1–1.7) had higher AL compared to Caucasians. Having cardiovascular disease (CVD) (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4–2.2) and diabetes (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 3.8–5.7) independently, as well as both CVD and diabetes (OR: 3.1; 95% CI 2.7–3.6), were associated with higher odds of AL. We conducted an age-adjusted regression model that indicated higher odds of elevated AL among females with diabetes independently (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2–1.9) and with both CVD and diabetes (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2–2.1) compared to men. Conclusions: Despite the significant impact and association of AL with overall health, there is minimal evidence of its risk factors and linkage to disease burden. Modifiable lifestyle factors were associated with a higher AL. There is a critical need to support ethnic and gender contextual interventions to reduce the burden of AL on chronic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Memiah et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Allostatic Load, Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes (n=10,411). Cardiovascular disease and diabetes (dual chronic conditions) vs. Neither condition was evaluated on High allostatic load (≥3 indicators) (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.7-3.6, p=<0.001). Having both cardiovascular disease and diabetes was associated with significantly higher odds of elevated allostatic load (OR 3.1) compared to having neither condition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: