Key result
Higher hepatic steatosis index linked to ~53% lower all-cause mortality in older HF patients.
Why the study?
The prognostic significance of non-invasive indices for steatotic liver disease, such as the hepatic steatosis index, remained uncertain in older patients with heart failure given the high prevalence of frailty and nutritional impairment in this population.
Does a higher hepatic steatosis index (HSI) predict lower all-cause mortality compared to the lowest HSI quartile in older patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,322)
Does a higher hepatic steatosis index (HSI) predict lower all-cause mortality compared to the lowest HSI quartile in older patients with heart failure?
In older patients with heart failure, a low hepatic steatosis index is independently associated with higher mortality and poorer nutritional status and muscle mass, suggesting it reflects malnutrition or sarcopenia rather than a favorable metabolic profile.
Background Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is increasingly recognised as an important modifier of cardiovascular risk in patients with heart failure (HF), owing to its close association with metabolic disorders. Several non-invasive indices for identifying SLD have been proposed; however, their prognostic significance in older patients with HF remains uncertain, particularly given the high prevalence of frailty and nutritional impairment in this population. Purpose We aimed to investigate the association between the hepatic steatosis index (HSI), a non-invasive screening tool for SLD and metabolic-associated SLD, and mortality in older patients with HF. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of the FRAGILE-HF study. Older patients with HF in whom HSI could be calculated were included. HSI was calculated as follows: HSI = 8 × (alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase ratio) + body mass index (+2 for female sex; +2 for diabetes mellitus). Patients were stratified into quartiles according to HSI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV mortality were analysed as secondary outcomes. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for the MAGGIC risk score and log-transformed B-type natriuretic peptide. Results A total of 1322 older patients with HF were analysed (median age, 81 years [interquartile range, 74–86 years]; 57.2% male). During a follow-up of 2 years [interquartile range, 1.4–2.0 years], 274 all-cause deaths (21.0%) occurred. Higher HSI was significantly associated with lower mortality (Figure 1). Compared with the lowest quartile (Q1), adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 0.759 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.561–1.025; p=0.072) in Q2, 0.533 (95% CI 0.380–0.747; p<0.001) in Q3, and 0.469 (95% CI 0.318–0.692; p<0.001) in Q4. Higher HSI was also associated with lower risks of both CV and non-CV mortality (Figure 2). Furthermore, a lower HSI was significantly associated with reduced skeletal muscle mass and fat mass, as well as a worse the controlling nutritional status score (all p for trend<0.001). Conclusions In older patients with HF, a low HSI was independently associated with increased mortality and poorer skeletal muscle mass, fat mass, and overall nutritional status. Given that SLD is generally considered a cardiovascular risk factor, low SLD risk scores in older patients with HF may instead reflect malnutrition or sarcopenia rather than a favourable metabolic profile. Caution is therefore warranted when interpreting SLD risk indices in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noda et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=1,322). Higher hepatic steatosis index (HSI, highest quartile Q4) vs. Lowest hepatic steatosis index quartile (Q1) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.469, 95% CI 0.318-0.692, p=<0.001). Higher hepatic steatosis index (Q4 vs Q1) was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality in older heart failure patients (HR 0.469; 95% CI 0.318-0.692; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: