Key result
The SCHFI v.7.2 demonstrated adequate structural validity (CFI=0.981, RMSEA=0.040) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.92) in Colombian outpatients with heart failure.
Why the study?
The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) is widely used to assess HF self-care competency, but its cultural and psychometric validity for version 7.2 needed to be established in a Colombian population.
Does the culturally adapted Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) v.7.2 demonstrate adequate psychometric validity and reliability in a Colombian outpatient population with heart failure?
Cross-Sectional (n=200)
Does the culturally adapted Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) v.7.2 demonstrate adequate psychometric validity and reliability in a Colombian outpatient population with heart failure?
The culturally adapted SCHFI v.7.2 demonstrates adequate structural validity and reliability for evaluating self-care in Colombian outpatients with heart failure, though the maintenance subscale requires further cultural adjustment.
Supports SCHFI v7.2 in Colombian HF patients; extends prior versions but leaves open outcome prediction and longitudinal validation.
Background Heart failure (HF) is a chronic clinical syndrome that requires adequate self-care to improve health outcomes. The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) is one of the most widely used instruments to assess this competency, but its cultural and psychometric validity must be established in each context. Objective To culturally adapt and validate version 7.2 of the SCHFI in a Colombian population diagnosed with HF. Methods An observational and cross-sectional study was conducted with 200 outpatients. A cultural adaptation of the SCHFI v.7.2 was carried out along with an analysis of its psychometric properties: feasibility; acceptability; and structural, predictive, and convergent validity. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α, Omega₂, Omega₃, and test-retest. Results The theoretical structure of the instrument was confirmed with appropriate fit indices (CFI = 0.981, TLI = 0.978, RMSEA = 0.040, SRMR = 0.073). Reliability was high for symptom perception (ω₂ = 0.83) and self-care management (ω₂ = 0.76). Test-retest stability was excellent (ICC = 0.92; CCC = 0.92). Discriminative validity was demonstrated according to functional class and BNP levels (p < 0.05), and moderate convergent validity with self-efficacy (r = 0.49–0.51) Conclusion The SCHFI v.7.2 demonstrates adequate structural validity and reliability in a Colombian population with HF. The maintenance subscale showed lower consistency, suggesting the need for cultural adjustment. The instrument is useful and robust for evaluating self-care in both clinical and research settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Achury et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=200). Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) version 7.2 was evaluated on Psychometric properties (structural, predictive, and convergent validity, and reliability) of the SCHFI v.7.2 (CFI 0.981, TLI 0.978, RMSEA 0.040, SRMR 0.073; ICC 0.92, p=<0.05). The SCHFI v.7.2 demonstrated adequate structural validity (CFI=0.981, RMSEA=0.040) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.92) in Colombian outpatients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: