Key result
Hemoadsorption during VA-ECMO linked to an ~84% drop in IL-6 and reduced vasopressor needs.
Why the study?
In VA-ECMO patients, hemoadsorption may reduce systemic inflammation, but its clinical benefit, optimal timing, clinical effects, and safety remained uncertain.
Observational (n=50)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective registry reveals reduced inflammation and vasopressor needs with hemoadsorption during VA-ECMO, suggesting early use shortens support duration.
Background/Introduction The International COSMOS Registry prospectively collects real-world data of hemoadsorption (HA) use in critically ill cardiac patients. In VA-ECMO patients, HA may reduce systemic inflammation, but its clinical benefit remains uncertain. Purpose To analyze the use of HA in VA-ECMO patients, focusing on timing, clinical effects, and safety. Methods The Registry protocol was approved by institutional Ethics Committees and all participants provided informed consent. Data were prospectively collected at screening, 24 hours pre and post HA, ICU discharge, and 90-day follow-up. Analyses followed a predefined statistical analysis plan. Results are reported as mean ± SD or median [IQR]. HA initiation relative to ECMO start was stratified into early (≤24 hrs) and late (>24 hrs). Results 50 patients (mean age 57±13 years; 26% female) with median APACHE II score 25 [19, 31] from 10 centers (Germany, Portugal, Spain) were included. VA-ECMO indications were cardiogenic shock (62%), post-cardiotomy shock (5%), refractory ventricular tachycardia (8%), and periprocedural complications (11%); 57% had cardiac arrest before ECMO. HA was integrated into renal replacement therapy (80%), used as standalone hemoperfusion (12%), or connected to an ECMO bypass loop (8%). Median devices per patient were 4 [2, 7]; 30% received ≥6 devices, with 15 [9, 24] hours per device. Twenty-four hours after HA, interleukin-6 decreased (524 [187, 4,877] to 83 [49, 224] pg/mL; p<0.0001), norepinephrine dose declined (0.13 [0.06, 0.29] to 0.04 [0, 0.14] µg/kg/min; p=0.0005), and fluid balance improved (+875 [-246, 2,549] to +190 [-849, 1,108] mL/day; p=0.011). Platelet counts were unchanged (p=0.058). SOFA scores improved from 14.5 [12, 16] to 12.5 [11, 15] (p=0.032). ICU mortality was 34% and 90-day mortality 44.7%. Early (n=27) versus late (n=23) HA initiation was associated with shorter ECMO duration (7 [4, 11] vs 14 [10, 29] days; p<0.001). Among survivors, early HA was linked to shorter ICU stay (23 [18, 26] vs 35 [25, 57] days; p=0.024) and hospital stay (23 [19, 40] vs 49 [28, 68] days; p=0.017). No HA-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion In VA-ECMO patients, concomitant hemoadsorption was associated with reduced vasopressor needs, lower inflammatory markers, and improved organ dysfunction within 24 hours. Early initiation (≤24 hrs) was linked to shorter ECMO support and faster recovery. Controlled prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirschning et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Critically ill cardiac patients undergoing VA-ECMO (primarily cardiogenic shock) (n=50). Hemoadsorption (HA) during VA-ECMO (including early ≤24 hrs vs late >24 hrs initiation) vs. Pre-hemoadsorption baseline or late initiation (>24 hrs) was evaluated on 24-hour changes in interleukin-6, norepinephrine dose, fluid balance, and SOFA score; 90-day mortality; ECMO duration by initiation timing (p=<0.0001). Hemoadsorption during VA-ECMO reduced IL-6 and norepinephrine needs at 24h, while early initiation (≤24h) shortened ECMO duration.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: