Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the Selection–Stitch Model (SSM), the vacuum is a quantum code, and the mass of a defect is the cost of verifying it. We ask how a verification cost becomes an energy. We let an excitation that fails checks carry a local mass equal to their cost, and define a state's verification cost as the rise in its energy when this mass is switched on. If the checks fail everywhere outside a region, the strong-coupling form of the quantum Zeno effect makes this cost equal to the lowest mode energy of the field in that region. This energy has the form xħc/L. We read it as an instance of the SSM rule that a defect's verification rate sets its Compton frequency. Landauer's principle, which prices erasure, does not apply to such standing information. For a massless quark, only a mass gives the bag wall. A projector penalty does not, and neither does an electric potential. On the lattice, a color singlet needs a whole tetrahedral cell. With a bond-verification term h added to the code's checks λ, the code maps onto a transverse-field Ising model, and an exact spectral check confirms the mapping. Quantum Monte Carlo on up to 2048 nodes finds free colors below h/λ ≈ 0.09 and a linear potential above 0.11, with a string tension that holds as the box grows. For the proton, the measured charge radius fixes the size of its 13-site verification region. Three confined quarks then give 865 MeV, 8% below the proton mass and nearly independent of the cavity's shape. The SSM's count of the same region's checks gives 938 MeV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raghu Kulkarni (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: