PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Physics Open7 citationsOpen Access

The Mass-Energy-Information Equivalence: A bottom-up identification of the particle spectrum via FCC lattice error correction

View Full Paper
RKRaghu Kulkarni

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the relationship between mass, energy, and information through quantum error correction in particles.
  • Modeling the vacuum as a quantum error-correcting code on the FCC lattice.
  • Classifying defect geometries and filtering candidate states through thermodynamic and topological axioms.
  • Testing five stable states against known empirical mass ratios.
  • Five states were found with verification costs of 1, 207, 273, 1836, and 1839, matching particle masses within 0.12%.
  • Rejected configurations did not comply with physical constraints and matched no known particles.
  • Provides evidence that mass may be tied to quantum error correction overhead.

Abstract

Does information possess physical mass? Modelling the physical vacuum as a substrate-free quantum error-correcting code suggests that an elementary particle’s mass is simply its fault-tolerant verification cost. We test this Mass-Energy-Information (M/E/I) equivalence on the Face-Centred Cubic (FCC) lattice, tracking defects within a [ 192 , 130 , 3 ] CSS code. Through a bottom-up classification of all possible defect geometries, we filter 25 candidate states through four strict thermodynamic and topological axioms — Minimum Topological Dimension, Sector Completeness, Boundary Closure, and Kinematic Shedding — each derived from established QEC theory or lattice gauge theory. Exactly 5 physically stable states survive this sieve. Their verification costs — 1, 207, 273, 1836, and 1839 — match the empirical mass ratios of the electron, muon, pion, proton, and neutron to within 0.12%. The rejected configurations violate specific physical constraints and match no known particles. No parameters are fitted. This offers highly constrained macroscopic evidence that inertial rest mass is the thermodynamic shadow of quantum error correction overhead.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raghu Kulkarni (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f19f9cedf4b468248066c6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physo.2026.100414
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Holographic Circlette: Unifying the Standard Model, Gravity, and Cosmology via Error-Correcting Codes on a Fisher-Information Lattice2026
  2. 2Topological Mass Quantization in the OHV Framework: From Icosahedral Symmetry to Predictive Particle Spectroscopy2026
  3. 3The Proton Mass from Atomic Spectra: A Geometric Derivation2026
  4. 4The Topological Origin of Mass and Charge: Deriving Fermionic Properties from a Discrete Möbius Substrate2026
  5. 5The Topological Phase Equivalence of Mass and Light2026