This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Traditional research on employee well-being often uses regression-based models that assume unidirectional effects between job demands or resources and well-being outcomes, potentially oversimplifying their complex interrelationships. We conceptualize well-being states, job demands, and resources as an interconnected network that may change over time. To illustrate the interplay among well-being states and well-being factors (i.e., job demands, job resources, personal resources), we first employ the psychological network approach (PNA) to provide a comprehensive understanding of these interrelationships, considering all relationships simultaneously. Second, we use the PNA to explore how this network of relationships changes over time, specifically in a coaching context designed to foster proactive personal and professional development. A sample of 332 Dutch physicians completed online questionnaires before (T1) and after (T2) the coaching period. At T1, personal resources were strongly connected to well-being states, particularly work engagement and stress. At T2, resources showed more negative connections with cynicism compared to T1. These findings showcase the PNA’s value for capturing the complexity of overall well-being and exploring how relationships evolve over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stojanović et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: