Psychosocial risks at work (PRW) are major determinants of workers’ well-being and health, yet comprehensive, accessible, and scientifically rigorous instruments to assess both PRW and related outcomes remain limited. This study introduces the open-access Questionnaire on Psychosocial Risks, Well-being, and Health at Work (QRBEST; Questionnaire sur les Risques psychosociaux, le Bien-Être et la Santé au Travail), developed and validated through a three-phase process including 1) questionnaire development, 2) item and scale refinement, and 3) psychometric evaluation. The French version of the questionnaire was administered to three heterogeneous samples: a population-based panel representative of Québec’s working population (n = 3000), healthcare workers (n = 708), and workers from eight small and medium-sized enterprises (n = 705). The resulting questionnaire comprises 127 items assessing 26 PRW alongside 12 indicators of well-being, health, and productivity and activity impairment. A psychometric evaluation—including analyses of internal consistency, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, test-retest reliability, concurrent criterion-related validity, and discriminant validity—indicated that all assessed properties ranged from adequate to excellent. Findings support the QRBEST as a reliable instrument for assessing PRW and associated outcomes across diverse organizational contexts, offering researchers and practitioners a decision-support tool to guide risk assessment and inform PRW prevention and intervention efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilbert‐Ouimet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: