Fibroblast Growth Factor [FGF23] and α-Klotho, key regulators of phosphate balance, become progressively dysregulated in Chronic Kidney Disease [CKD]. This study aimed to create a composite risk score integrating these biomarkers with renal and cardiovascular markers. One hundred sixty hospitalised patients with CKD stages G2-G5 (40 per stage) participated in the study. FGF23–Klotho CKD–CV composite score (FKCS) derived from: FGF23–Klotho axis sub-score of log FGF23 plus soluble α-Klotho plus FGF23: Klotho (0–8 points), CKD progression sub-score of eGFR plus creatinine plus bicarbonate plus haemoglobin (0–8 points) and cardiovascular remodelling sub-score of composite index Carotid Intima Media Thickness [CIMT] plus Ankle Brachial Pressure Index [ABPI] plus Left Ventricular Hypertrophy [LVH] plus Aortic Valve[AV] sclerosis (0–6 points). Total score varies from a score of 0–24 categorised as low (0–8), moderate (9–16), and high (17–24). Bootstrap resampling used for internal validation. Median composite scores increased significantly across CKD stages: G2:5.0, G3:10.0, G4:14.5, G5:16.0 (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001). Log-FGF23 and FGF23:Klotho ratio increased significantly with advancing stage (both p < 0.001), but klotho did not ( p = 0.907), reflecting early, ubiquitous nature of Klotho depletion. CIMT showed strongest correlation with the composite score ( r = 0.648, p < 0.001) and eGFR ( r = − 0.824, p < 0.001). The FGF23:Klotho ratio correlated significantly with CIMT ( r = 0.329, p < 0.001) and composite Cardio Vascular [CV] index ( r = 0.209, p = 0.009). Area Under Curve [AUC] for discriminating advanced CKD (G4 + G5) was 0.921, as compared with eGFR alone (0.988). High cardiovascular remodelling burden AUC was 0.858. Risk tier distribution, strongly stage-stratified: G2 patients(82.5% )- Low-risk, G5 patients(45.0%) - High-risk. FKCS is an internally validated composite score that captures CKD-related endocrine and cardiovascular burden, offering risk stratification beyond eGFR, but requires prospective validation and therapeutic assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moorthy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: