Objective: Ideally, schedules should provide sufficient time for quality patient examinations, sufficient time for other examination-related activities, and recovery time for sonographers. One difficulty with examination times and scheduling is the variability among examinations due to a myriad of factors. The objective of this work was an improved understanding of these factors and their relation to sonographer workload, potentially leading to better-informed scheduling in the future. Materials and Methods: A collaborative approach was used to (1) develop a list of potential workload-contributing factors, (2) document factor occurrence during examinations, and (3) explore associations between workload factors and perceived workload. Results: Notable differences were seen in workload between examinations. The association between total number of workload factors and perceived workload was stronger than between workload variables and examination duration. Conclusion: This supports the concept that more dynamic, flexible scheduling that accounts for situation-level workload experiences may aid in providing more appropriate and sustainable workloads for sonographers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sommerich et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: