Background Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) is highly prevalent, but access barriers limit treatment uptake. We systematically tele-adapted a validated 90-minute yoga therapy module into a brief 30-minute format and evaluated its acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary clinical effects. Methods Using expert content validation (n = 10), we developed a 30-minute tele-yoga module comprising Sukshma Vyayama, Vibhagiya Pranayama (6:4:8:4 ratio), Chandra Anuloma Viloma (4:8 ratio), Nadishodhana Pranayama, Bhramari Pranayama, and Yoga Nidra. Twenty adults (18 to 55 years) diagnosed with GAD (GAD-7 score of 5 or higher), with or without comorbid neurotic disorder, on stable pharmacotherapy or drug-naive, received one in-person orientation followed by thrice-weekly live tele-yoga sessions and weekly yoga philosophy discussions over 8 weeks. Primary outcomes included feasibility metrics: Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), attendance, dropout rate, and Yoga Performance Assessment (YPA). Secondary outcomes were GAD-7 and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. The Friedman test was used for repeated-measures analysis on completers (n = 17). Results Seventeen of 20 participants (85%) completed the intervention with over 80% attendance. Three withdrew for non-intervention reasons. All feasibility criteria were met: AIM 4.52 +/− 0.21, FIM 4.45 +/− 0.18, CSQ 30.05 +/− 1.14, YPA 30.11 +/− 1.36. GAD-7 scores decreased significantly from a median of 13.0 (IQR 11.0 to 15.0) at baseline to 7.0 (IQR 6.0 to 8.0) at 8 weeks (chi-square = 33.52, p < 0.001). PSQI improved from 12.0 (IQR 11.0 to 15.0) to 7.0 (IQR 4.0 to 7.0) (chi-square = 31.39, p < 0.001). No adverse events occurred. Conclusions This brief tele-adapted yoga module is feasible, acceptable, and shows promising preliminary effects on anxiety and sleep quality in GAD. Randomized controlled trials are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jasti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: