Purpose This study investigates the macroeconomic determinants of agricultural total factor productivity (ATFP), specifically inorganic fertilizer consumption (as a proxy for agricultural input intensity and indirect soil health dynamics), foreign direct investment (FDI), human development, agricultural employment and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, across the 10 African nations with the highest levels of agricultural employment. Design/methodology/approach Utilizing panel data spanning 2000–2022, the study employs Driscoll–Kraay standard errors and feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) estimators to account for cross-sectional dependence, slope heterogeneity and heteroskedasticity. Findings In the primary Driscoll–Kraay specification, FER and CO2 have negative coefficients, but those coefficients are not statistically significant at conventional levels; thus, we interpret these findings in a cautious and suggestive manner. Conversely, FDI and human development index (HDI) exert statistically significant positive impacts on productivity. Agricultural employment also correlates positively with ATFP under current labor-intensive farming regimes. Furthermore, spectral Granger causality confirms that FDI and HDI govern productivity across short-, medium- and long-term horizons, whereas labor and climate factors predominantly exhibit longer-term causal signals. Research limitations/implications While this macro-level panel analysis provides a comprehensive overview, it does not fully capture the extensive heterogeneity in local soil, farming practices and socio-cultural contexts across the 10 countries. Originality/value This research proposes a strategy for transitioning from labor-intensive subsistence farming toward sustainable, technology-fostered intensification tailored to the needs of Africa's largest agricultural employers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seraj et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: