Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper investigates how seam geometry affects the lateral force on a cricket ball using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in ANSYS Fluent. The seam was modified to 4 mm wide and approximately 1 mm high with a sharp profile. Simulations used the standard k-ε turbulence model at an inlet velocity of 35 m/s (Reynolds number ≈ 1.7×10⁵) in a 250 × 250 × 500 mm domain. Non-rotating and rotating (ω = 30 rad/s) balls were simulated at seam angles of 35°, 45°, 55°, 65°, 75° and 90°, and results were compared with published standard-seam values. For the non-rotating ball, the peak lateral force was 0.567 N at 55°, 27.7% above the reference value of 0.444 N. The modified seam gave higher forces at 35°–55° but lower forces at 65° and 75° (57.1% and 94.4% lower), indicating a stronger but narrower effective swing window. For the rotating ball, the peak force was 0.565 N at 55°, and the force at 45° was 0.526 N, compared with 0.186 N in the reference. Because the baseline values come from the literature rather than from a standard-seam run with the present setup, the differences should be read as indicative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saeed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: