Digital work increasingly extends employees’ psychological availability beyond formal working hours, making the boundary between work and non-work more permeable. Research on work-related extended availability has consistently linked after-hours availability with impaired recovery, work-life conflict and poorer wellbeing. What remains less clear is how off-job time can become psychologically constrained even when no work is actually performed. This paper introduces psychological standby time (PST) as an off-job experiential state characterised by anticipatory readiness for possible work demands and vigilance about remaining reachable. PST arises during formally non-working periods in which no substantive work task is being performed, yet employees experience their time as only conditionally available for non-work life. Conservation of resources (COR) theory provides the primary explanatory framework by showing how standby can restrict resource replenishment while requiring continued cognitive and self-regulatory investment. Attention research clarifies the within-episode processes of readiness and vigilance, while the job demands-resources (JD-R) perspective is used to organise the work conditions and resources that may increase or reduce the likelihood of PST. The paper differentiates PST from work-related extended availability, workplace telepressure, psychological detachment, organisational e-mail monitoring expectations, after-hours work and formal on-call arrangements by advancing a specific prediction: anticipated organisational claims may constrain the usability of non-work time even when no message is received and no work is undertaken. The framework also separates PST from its consequences. PST comprises anticipatory readiness and reachability vigilance; activity foreclosure refers to the selective avoidance, postponement or modification of activities that carry high anticipated interruption costs; and repeated foreclosure may, over time, narrow the range of non-work activities employees perceive as realistically available. The framework distinguishes within-evening processes, next-morning recovery and longer-term outcomes, and offers testable propositions together with preliminary guidance for assessing PST as a fluctuating state and as a pattern of repeated exposure. The proposed relationships remain subject to empirical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nthabeleng Innocentia Mdhluli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: