Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sign language is characterized as natural visual-gestural language with autonomous linguistic structures, varied orthographic influences, and legal status. Despite the recent advancements in deep learning-based recognition systems, these systems face the problem of regional biases, which limits the scalability of the systems and excludes millions of users from low-resource backgrounds. The study focuses on a comprehensive Global Taxonomy and Computational Characterization of several significant sign languages across five continents of the world. These languages are classified based on six crucial parameters: alphabetic adaptation, linguistic family, legal status, user population, manual spelling structures: one-handed or two-handed. The research proposes a Hierarchical Transformer Architecture capable of accommodating various linguistic variations. It follows a three-layer approach: a universal hand pose encoder, family-specific adaptation, and classifier head. Moreover, it presents a Global Sign Language Complexity Index (GSLCI) and a Fairness Index to measure the complexities of various sign language. Analysis of the proposed optimized framework indicates a maximum accuracy of 91% using the common features of various language families which can be considered a preferable mode of communication for people with hearing and speech impairments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harish et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: