Key result
Unipolar voltage mapping identifies epicardial breakthrough after PFA-PVI with ~2.3-fold higher voltages for QR electrograms.
Why the study?
Does combined bipolar and unipolar voltage mapping identify epicardial breakthrough regions after pulsed field ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=30)
Does combined bipolar and unipolar voltage mapping identify epicardial breakthrough regions after pulsed field ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Combined bipolar and unipolar voltage mapping, along with unipolar electrogram morphology analysis, provides additional utility for identifying epicardial breakthrough regions and intramural conduction gaps at pulsed field ablation sites.
May enhance epicardial breakthrough detection after PFA-PVI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The utility of unipolar voltage (UV) mapping for identifying epicardial breakthrough regions after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains undetermined. This study assessed combined bipolar voltage (BV) and UV mapping for identifying epicardial breakthrough regions after pulsed field ablation (PFA). Thirty patients with atrial fibrillation underwent initial PFA-PVI with a pentaspline catheter under fluoroscopic guidance. Within the isolated PV antrum (BV <0.1 mV), transmurally ablated regions and epicardial breakthrough regions were defined by UV <1.08 mV and UV ≥1.08 mV, respectively. Unipolar electrogram features were investigated to identify epicardial breakthrough regions. Seventeen patients had 27 epicardial breakthrough regions, yielding 276 local unipolar electrograms (QR pattern: n=160; RS pattern: n=116). QR electrograms were distributed broadly within the isolated PV, whereas RS electrograms occurred exclusively around the isolation boundary. QR electrograms, indicating possible epicardial breakthrough, had significantly higher UV amplitudes than RS electrograms (median: 1.64 vs. 0.70 mV; P<0.001). The UV amplitude cutoff distinguishing these morphologies was 1.15 mV (sensitivity, 91.9%; specificity, 84.5%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.922; P<0.001). Among 245 local unipolar electrograms around the isolation boundary, excluding QR electrograms, RS electrograms had higher UV amplitudes and steeper negative intrinsic deflection slopes than non-RS electrograms, suggesting possible intramural conduction gaps. Respective cutoffs were 0.48 mV (sensitivity, 83.6%; specificity, 86.8%; AUC, 0.923; P<0.001) and 0.020 mV/ms (sensitivity, 97.4%; specificity, 94.5%; AUC, 0.992; P<0.001). Combined BV and UV mapping provides additional information for identifying epicardial breakthrough regions at PFA application sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=30). Combined bipolar and unipolar voltage mapping (QR vs RS electrogram patterns) vs. RS electrogram pattern (around isolation boundary) was evaluated on Unipolar voltage (UV) amplitude distinguishing QR from RS electrogram morphologies in epicardial breakthrough regions (AUC 0.922, p=<0.001). Combined bipolar and unipolar voltage mapping identified epicardial breakthrough after PFA-PVI, with QR electrograms showing higher UV than RS (1.64 vs 0.70 mV; P<0.001; AUC 0.922).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Heart Rhythm