Key result
Drug-coated balloons complement drug-eluting stents for coronary in-stent restenosis and selected de novo lesions.
Why the study?
Evidence supporting drug-coated balloons has expanded substantially across coronary in-stent restenosis and de novo lesions, though recent randomized trials in broader all-comer populations have yielded mixed results regarding device choice and patient selection.
Do drug-coated balloons provide comparable or superior outcomes compared to drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis and de novo coronary lesions?
Do drug-coated balloons provide comparable or superior outcomes compared to drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis and de novo coronary lesions?
Drug-coated balloons are an established treatment for coronary in-stent restenosis and an expanding option for de novo coronary lesions (especially small vessels), serving as a complementary tool to drug-eluting stents for personalized revascularization.
Drug-coated balloons (DCB) have emerged as an important treatment modality in percutaneous coronary intervention by providing effective local antiproliferative drug delivery without leaving a permanent metallic implant. Robust evidence supports their use for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR), where DCB represent an established alternative to repeat drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation while avoiding additional stent layers. Contemporary data suggest that although repeat DES implantation may reduce TLR in selected patients with DES-ISR, DCB remain particularly attractive in many patient subsets, including those with excellent predilation results, multiple stent layers, major side branches, and those with bare-metal ISR. Careful lesion preparation and increasing use of intracoronary imaging are critical determinants of procedural success. Beyond ISR, evidence supporting DCB in de novo coronary disease has expanded substantially, particularly in small-vessel disease, where randomized trials and patient-level meta-analyses demonstrate outcomes comparable or superior to contemporary DES. Growing data also support DCB use in selected complex anatomical and clinical scenarios, including bifurcation lesions, diabetes, acute coronary syndromes, and patients at high bleeding risk. Recent randomized trials evaluating DCB in broader all-comer populations have yielded mixed results, highlighting the absence of a class effect among DCB technologies and the importance of device choice, operator experience, and optimal patient selection. Ongoing randomized trials evaluating next-generation paclitaxel- and limus-based DCB are expected to better define patient selection and the complementary roles of DCB and DES. Rather than competing technologies, DCB and DES should be considered complementary tools that enable increasingly personalized coronary revascularization strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfonso et al. (2026) conducted a review in Coronary in-stent restenosis and de novo coronary artery disease. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) vs. Drug-eluting stents (DES) was evaluated. Drug-coated balloons serve as a complementary revascularization tool to drug-eluting stents in coronary in-stent restenosis and selected de novo lesions, though outcomes vary across devices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: