Why the study?
Despite advances in PCI and new DES iterations, complications like stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis persist, making DCBs a promising option to treat coronary lesions without metallic implants.
Does the use of drug-coated balloons improve outcomes compared to drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease?
Does the use of drug-coated balloons improve outcomes compared to drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Drug-coated balloons are currently best suited for small-vessel disease and selected in-stent restenosis, while drug-eluting stents remain preferable for large de novo lesions and main branch bifurcations.
INTRODUCTION: Despite technical advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and new iterations of drug-eluting stents (DES), complications still occur, including stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis (ISR). Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide a promising option for the treatment of coronary lesions - particularly when DES are undesirable or contraindicated - allowing for PCI without the implantation of metallic devices, thus adhering to the 'leave nothing behind' principle. AREAS COVERED: A comprehensive literature search has been performed on PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane, up to November 2024, with no significant restrictions. This article provides an overview of available DCB and summarizes the evidence supporting their use in different settings, including ISR, small-vessel disease, de novo large-vessel disease, and bifurcations. EXPERT OPINION: Trials of DCB are heterogeneous with respect to population, sample size, follow-up, anatomical pattern, and device used. Furthermore, they usually have limited statistical power for clinical endpoints. Based on current knowledge, DES may be preferrable for DES-ISR, de novo lesions in large vessels and for the treatment of the main branch in true bifurcations, with DCB approved for small-vessel disease and selected ISR lesions. Ongoing trials are expected to provide definitive insights into the efficacy and safety of DCB in different scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greco et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: