Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to support glaucoma detection and monitoring, with rapid advances in deep learning, multimodal imaging, and longitudinal prediction. This review evaluates the evidence supporting these developments and identifies barriers to clinical translation. AREAS COVERED: A systematic search of PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261450819). Of 3,758 records identified, 63 eligible peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2026 were included. The review examined AI techniques, imaging modalities, datasets, diagnostic and predictive performance, validation strategies, and reported limitations in Glaucoma care. Most studies used deep learning applied to fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography, visual fields, or multimodal data. Many models achieved an area under the ROC curve of approximately 0.95. EXPERT OPINION: AI has substantial potential to improve glaucoma detection and monitoring, but high reported accuracy alone does not establish clinical readiness. Prospective multicenter validation using diverse populations, explainable and reproducible models, standardized evaluation, and integration into clinical workflows are essential before widespread implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arjunan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: