This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This research compares health-related physical fitness and anthropometric profiles of competitive sprinters and long-distance runners. A cross-sectional comparative design was used with 200 male athletes aged 17–25 years from Rohtak, Sonipat, Hisar, and Kurukshetra districts of Haryana. The sample included 100 sprinters and 100 long-distance runners with inter-university or senior-national competition experience. Physical fitness was assessed through the Cooper 12-minute run, flexed-arm hang, standing broad jump, sit-and-reach test, and BMI, while eight anthropometric dimensions were examined. The results revealed clear differences between the two groups. Long-distance runners covered 3151.79 m in the Cooper test compared with 2771.45 m for sprinters, giving a difference of 380.34 m and the largest fitness effect (d = 1.090). Sprinters performed better in the flexed-arm hang and standing broad jump, whereas long-distance runners recorded higher sit-and-reach scores. Sprinters also had greater body mass, height, leg length, and chest, thigh, calf, and upper-arm circumferences. Thigh circumference produced the strongest anthropometric difference (d = 0.903), while arm length did not differ significantly. Leg length was positively related to standing broad jump performance (r = .657). Overall, the findings indicate that sprinters and long-distance runners develop distinct but overlapping physical profiles. Athlete assessment should therefore consider the specific demands of each running event rather than using one common standard of fitness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Devi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: