Key result
Significant CAD is not associated with differences in P-wave dispersion compared to non-significant disease.
Why the study?
P-wave dispersion on a 12-lead ECG reflects heterogeneous atrial conduction, motivating a comparison of P-wave parameters between patients with angiographically significant and non-significant CAD.
Do P-wave parameters (including P-wave dispersion) differ between patients with angiographically significant versus non-significant coronary artery disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=58)
No
Do P-wave parameters (including P-wave dispersion) differ between patients with angiographically significant versus non-significant coronary artery disease?
In this small cross-sectional study, electrocardiographic P-wave parameters including P-wave dispersion did not significantly differentiate between patients with angiographically significant and non-significant coronary artery disease.
Does not support P-wave dispersion for CAD evaluation; leaves open its role in arrhythmia risk stratification.
Background: P-wave dispersion (PWD), defined as the difference between the longest and shortest P-wave durations on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), reflects heterogeneous atrial conduction. This study aimed to compare P-wave parameters between patients with significant and non-significant coronary artery disease (CAD) based on coronary angiography. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 58 patients who underwent coronary angiography at Sultan Agung Islamic Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia, from January to September 2023. Participants were recruited consecutively. Stenosis ≥50% was classified as significant CAD and <50% as non-significant CAD. P-wave durations were measured manually from magnified ECG tracings. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using independent-samples t-tests and chi-square tests, respectively. Results: Of 58 participants, 34 had significant CAD and 24 had non-significant CAD. Mean age was higher in the significant CAD group (62.05±7.54 vs. 56.20±11.46 years; p=0.035). P-wave minimum duration (51.1±17.2 vs. 48.3±15.5 ms; p=0.57), maximum duration (107.0±23.5 vs. 95.8±25.7 ms; p=0.14), and PWD (55.9±22.1 vs. 47.5±26.2 ms; p=0.29) were higher in the significant CAD group, but none differed significantly. Conclusions: P-wave parameters did not differ significantly between patients with significant and non-significant CAD. Larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the relationship between P-wave parameters and angiographic CAD severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abduh et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=58). Significant coronary artery disease (stenosis >=50%) vs. Non-significant coronary artery disease (stenosis <50%) was evaluated on P-wave dispersion (PWD) in ms (p=0.29). Angiographically significant CAD was not associated with a significant difference in P-wave dispersion compared to non-significant CAD (55.9±22.1 vs. 47.5±26.2 ms; p=0.29).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: