Why the study?
Although electrical stimulation is the standard for cardiac pacing, scalable, contactless, spatially precise, and cell-selective alternative pacing methods are needed for in vitro and in vivo applications.
Does integration of optogenetically and sonogenetically modified cell spheroid actuators enable rapid, contactless light- and ultrasound-based pacing of unmodified human iPSC-derived cardiac constructs?
Does integration of optogenetically and sonogenetically modified cell spheroid actuators enable rapid, contactless light- and ultrasound-based pacing of unmodified human iPSC-derived cardiac constructs?
Genetically engineered optogenetic and sonogenetic cell spheroids can rapidly integrate with unmodified human cardiac tissue constructs within hours to enable contactless pacing by light or ultrasound, offering a scalable tool for high-throughput drug screening and potential regenerative therapies.
May aid in vitro cardiac tissue models; leaves open translation to contactless pacing in vivo.
Electrical stimulation for cardiac pacing has been in clinical use for 100 years and it is the current standard. Alternative scalable pacing methods that are contactless, with good spatial precision and can also be cell-selective are of interest for both in vitro and in vivo applications. Cardiac pacing by light or by ultrasound (US) can be achieved using optogenetic transduction of the tissue and by enhancing responsiveness to ultrasound. In this work we create specialized biological actuators (cell spheroids) out of generic human cells, modified optogenetically (using Channelrhodopsin2) and sonogenetically (using human Piezo1), guide them to a desired location to promote quick integration with unmodified cardiac syncytia within less than two hours. We quantify their ability to confer pacing by light or US and to entrain the native cardiac tissue, modeled here with human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) grown in monolayers, quasi-3D oriented microtissues or cell spheroids. Magnetic guidance (via magnetic nanoparticles) speeds up integration and facilitates positioning to optimize electrotonic load for pacing; size match and three-dimensional growth also accelerate integration. Computational modeling corroborates the possibility to pace by light and by US. Using optogenetically-gated US pulses (0.5 MHz), we show entrainment in voltage and calcium responses and identify the best performing configurations. Experiments reveal the potential role of Piezo1, esp. when activated with Yoda1. The approach is shown to work with physiologically relevant heart cells, such as human cardiac fibroblasts as optimized actuators, and therefore can be considered for in vivo applications as part of heart regeneration efforts. High-throughput cardiotoxicity testing and drug screening in vitro can directly benefit from deployment of such biological actuators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pettebone et al. (2026) studied Cardiac pacing and entrainment in in vitro human cardiac tissue models. Optogenetic (ChR2) and sonogenetic (Piezo1) biological actuator spheroids with magnetic nanoparticles (mNPs) vs. Spheroids without magnetic nanoparticles, central monolayer positioning, or unmodified syncytia without ultrasound/Yoda1 was evaluated on 1:1 optical pacing entrainment within 1-2 hours on 2D hiPSC-CM monolayers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: