Left Ventricular Diastolic Intraventricular Pressure Differences and Propagation Velocity with 4D-Flow MRI in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the gold standard for assessing left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD), but noninvasive alternatives are needed to overcome geometric and acoustic limitations. 4D-Flow MRI enables comprehensive assessment of intraventricular pressure differences (IVPDs) and flow propagation velocity (VP). We aimed to evaluate 4D-Flow-derived IVPDs and VP in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Methods Thirty-eight HCM patients and 38 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent TTE and 4D-Flow MRI. Spatiotemporal maps of velocity and IVPDs, decomposed into inertial and convective components, were derived along the main inflow streamline from the mitral valve to the apex. Peak early filling rate (PEFR) was used to normalize IVPDs and VP. Results While absolute peak flow rates were comparable, HCM patients exhibited significantly faster VP (100.4 vs. 60.2 cm/s, p < 0.01) and higher positive early E IVPD (1.40 vs. 0.92 mmHg, p < 0.01) compared to controls. Normalizing IVPDs by PEFR amplified group differences, revealing a markedly increased flow-normalized E-IVPD (5.13 vs. 2.94 × 10⁻³ mmHg·ml⁻¹·s, p < 0.001) and deeper reverse ER IVPD (-6.06 vs. -4.61 × 10⁻³ mmHg·ml⁻¹·s, p < 0.01) in HCM. These differences were primarily driven by the inertial components. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that ER IVPD is independently determined by PEFR and the TTE E/E’ ratio (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). Conclusions 4D-Flow MRI-derived, flow-normalized IVPDs and propagation velocity provide robust, noninvasive markers of altered LV chamber stiffness and impaired diastolic filling in HCM, offering deeper 3D hemodynamic insights into diastolic dysfunction.