Key result
PFA acutely increases left atrial appendage emptying velocity by ~5 cm/s in atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Despite the close anatomical relationship between the left pulmonary veins and the left atrial appendage (LAA), acute intraprocedural changes in LAA flow and transmitral filling during pulsed field ablation (PFA) for AF remained poorly characterized.
Does pulsed field ablation acutely alter left atrial appendage emptying velocity in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation in sinus rhythm?
Observational (n=98)
Open-label
No
Does pulsed field ablation acutely alter left atrial appendage emptying velocity in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation in sinus rhythm?
Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation does not cause overall acute impairment of left atrial appendage flow—with emptying and filling velocities increasing on average immediately post-ablation—though a clinically notable minority (12.2%) experience a ≥20% acute reduction in appendage emptying velocity.
Acute LAA velocity rise after PFA may indicate improved emptying; hypothesis-generating for thromboembolic risk before practice change.
Background Despite the close anatomical relationship between the left pulmonary veins (PVs) and the left atrial appendage (LAA), acute changes in LAA flow during pulsed field ablation (PFA) remain poorly characterized. Objectives To characterize acute intraprocedural changes in LAA flow and transmitral filling during PFA for atrial fibrillation (AF) using paired intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Methods Patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing PFA were prospectively enrolled if they were in sinus rhythm at the beginning of the procedure. ICE was performed immediately before and after PFA to assess LAA emptying velocity (LAAEv), LAA filling velocity (LAAFv), transmitral E- and A-wave velocities, and E-wave deceleration time (EDT). Paired pre-to-post PFA changes were assessed, followed by a sensitivity analysis using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and exploratory subgroup analyses. Results Among 98 patients, LAAEv increased from 35.45 to 40.00 cm/s immediately after PFA (estimated paired increase, 4.95 cm/s; 95% CI, 2.35–7.80; P<0.001), while LAAFv increased by 4.36 cm/s (95% CI, 1.81–6.91; P=0.001). E-wave velocity increased by 8.69 cm/s and EDT decreased by 31.73 ms (both P<0.001), whereas A-wave velocity did not change significantly (P=0.08). In the ANCOVA model, changes in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and vasopressor use were not significantly associated with changes in LAAEv. A marked acute reduction in LAAEv (≥20%) occurred in 12 patients (12.2%). No significant subgroup interactions were observed. Conclusions LAA flow velocities increased acutely after PFA, accompanied by changes in transmitral filling, although a minority of patients showed a marked acute reduction in LAA emptying.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (n=98). Pulsed field ablation (FARAPULSE system) vs. Pre-ablation baseline (within-patient paired comparison) was evaluated on Within-patient change in left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAEv, cm/s) from before to immediately after pulsed field ablation (MD 4.95 cm/s, 95% CI 2.35-7.80, p=<0.001). Pulsed field ablation acutely increased left atrial appendage emptying velocity from 35.45 to 40.00 cm/s (paired increase 4.95 cm/s; 95% CI 2.35-7.80; P<0.001) in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: