Key result
Systolic timing and acute stress independently strengthen emotional and spatial response biases.
Why the study?
Acute stress and systolic cardioafferent signals each promote response bias during rapid threat-related decisions, but how acute stress and cardiac phase jointly affect affective and spatial response biases was unclear.
Does acute stress (via cold pressor test) and systolic cardiac phase alter affective and spatial response biases during rapid decision-making in healthy adults?
Does acute stress (via cold pressor test) and systolic cardiac phase alter affective and spatial response biases during rapid decision-making in healthy adults?
In healthy young adults, phasic baroreceptor signaling during cardiac systole and acute stress independently heighten the influence of task-irrelevant emotional and spatial cues on rapid action selection.
Acute stress and systolic signals may heighten affective-spatial biases in rapid decisions; hypothesis-generating for cardiovascular modulation in clinical populations.
Threatening situations often require rapid decisions which are particularly susceptible to response bias. The perception of threat also elicits an acute stress reaction, assumed to promote automatic action tendencies via several mechanisms. Cardioafferent signals during systole, for example, increase racially biased misidentifications of tools as weapons. Acute stress, linked to threat-biased decisions may both bias such decisions directly and alter cardiac effects on them. Here, we investigated the effects of cardiac phase and acute stress in a combined Weapon Identification and Simon Task. Thirty-one participants classified laterally or vertically presented weapons and tools with lateralized responses, such that target location and prime emotion provided task-irrelevant spatial and affective information. Target onsets were timed to systole or diastole, and in separate sessions participants were exposed to repeated feet cold pressor tests (CPT) and a warm-water control condition. The CPT reliably increased subjective, cardiovascular, and endocrine stress measures. Both systolic target onsets and CPT exposure strengthened the influence of emotional primes on weapon and tool classification, without evidence for general threat prioritization. For spatial compatibility, acute stress enlarged the Simon effect in sensitivity among fast responses, consistent with stronger initial automatic activation, and cardiac phase modulated the advantage of spatial correspondence over locations without dimensional overlap. Midfrontal theta showed prime-dependent target modulations with distinct patterns for cardiac phase and stress. Cardiac phase and stress did not interact, consistent with independent contributions rather than amplification or attenuation. Together, the findings indicate that acute stress and phasic cardioafferent signals both increase the influence of task-irrelevant affective and spatial information on action through partly distinct processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haugwitz et al. (2026) studied Healthy volunteers undergoing acute experimental stress (n=31). Repeated feet cold pressor test (CPT) and cardiac systole-timed stimulus presentation vs. Warm-water control condition (36-37°C) and cardiac diastole-timed presentation (~464 ms post R-peak) was evaluated on Affective and spatial response bias in the combined Weapon Identification and Simon Task. Both systolic target onsets and acute cold pressor stress independently strengthened the influence of emotional primes and spatial compatibility on weapon and tool classification in 31 healthy adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: