Key result
Alex Plus sirolimus-eluting stent shows ~3% 1-year target lesion revascularization in routine practice.
Why the study?
Postmarketing clinical data for the Alex Plus cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer remain limited. This study evaluated its 1-year safety and clinical efficacy in routine clinical practice.
What are the 1-year safety and clinical efficacy outcomes (target lesion revascularization and target vessel failure) of the Alex Plus biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in patients undergoing PCI in routine clinical practice?
Observational (n=547)
Open-label
Yes
What are the 1-year safety and clinical efficacy outcomes (target lesion revascularization and target vessel failure) of the Alex Plus biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in patients undergoing PCI in routine clinical practice?
In a real-world Spanish multicenter registry, the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Alex Plus stent demonstrated low 1-year rates of target lesion revascularization (3.1%), target vessel failure (3.5%), and stent thrombosis (0.7%), comparable to other contemporary drug-eluting stents.
Supports Alex Plus consideration in routine PCI; leaves open randomized trials to confirm comparative effectiveness.
Introduction and objectives:The Alex Plus stent is a cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer for which postmarketing clinical data remain limited.This study aimed to evaluate the 1-year safety and clinical efficacy of this Alex Plus stent in routine clinical practice.Methods: This prospective, multicenter, observational registry was conducted in Spain.Eligible patients were referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to stable angina, acute coronary syndrome with or without ST-segment elevation, or silent ischemia.Implantation of at least 1 Alex Plus stent was required, although the use of additional devices was permitted according to routine clinical practice.The primary endpoints were target lesion revascularization (TLR) of of lesions treated with the study stent and target vessel failure (TVF) at 1 year.Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).Results: 589 patients were enrolled; 547 (92.9%) were analyzed.Mean age was 65.7 ± 11.1 years.22.5% were women.Overall, 1006 stents were implanted, including 722 Alex Plus (71.8%).Acute coronary syndrome was the indication in 67%.In-hospital MACCE was 1.65%.At one-year, target lesion revascularization and target vessel failure were 3.1% and 3.5%, respectively; stent thrombosis occurred in 0.7%.Mortality was 4%, myocardial infarction 2%, stroke 1.5%, and overall MACCE 12.1%.Renal dysfunction strongly predicted mortality and MACCE, while disease extent and number of treated vessels and stents were associated with adverse events.Conclusions: In real-world clinical practice, the Alex Plus stent demonstrated low rates of revascularization and thrombosis at one-year, with a safety and efficacy profile comparable to that of other contemporary DES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bosco et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (acute coronary syndrome, stable angina, or silent ischemia) (n=547). Alex Plus sirolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer cobalt-chromium coronary stent was evaluated on Target lesion revascularization (TLR) involving the study stent at 1 year (co-primary with target vessel failure [TVF] at 3.5%, 95% CI 2.0-5.0) (95% CI 1.6-4.6). The Alex Plus sirolimus-eluting stent demonstrated a 3.1% (95% CI 1.6-4.6) target lesion revascularization rate and a 3.5% (95% CI 2.0-5.0) target vessel failure rate at 1 year in routine practice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: