Key result
ECPR is linked to ~95-unit higher PRU after ticagrelor compared to conventional resuscitation.
Why the study?
ECMO induces complex hemostatic disturbances, leaving the pharmacodynamic response to oral P2Y12 inhibitors during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation poorly characterized.
Does extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) alter platelet reactivity and the pharmacodynamic response to enteral crushed ticagrelor compared with conventional resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=36)
No
Does extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) alter platelet reactivity and the pharmacodynamic response to enteral crushed ticagrelor compared with conventional resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients undergoing PCI?
Enteral crushed ticagrelor results in delayed and attenuated P2Y12 platelet inhibition in ECPR patients undergoing PCI compared to conventionally resuscitated cardiac arrest patients, exposing them to a prolonged prothrombotic window alongside high bleeding risk.
May warrant platelet reactivity monitoring in ECPR-PCI; leaves open optimal ticagrelor dosing in cardiac arrest.
Background Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) induces complex hemostatic disturbances, and the pharmacodynamic response to oral P2Y12 inhibitors during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is poorly characterized. We compared platelet reactivity and ticagrelor response between ECPR and conventionally resuscitated cardiac arrest patients. Methods In this single-center analysis of two prospectively collected, non-contemporaneous cohorts, 16 adults undergoing ECPR and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were compared with 20 conventionally resuscitated cardiac arrest patients undergoing PCI without ECMO. All received crushed ticagrelor via gastric tube. Platelet reactivity was measured before and 2–48 h after loading by Multiplate adenosine diphosphate (ADP) aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (P2Y12 reaction units, PRU) and analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. Results Baseline PRU was lower in ECPR patients (median 220 vs. 246; p = 0.020), independently of platelet count. After loading, PRU declined more slowly with ECPR (group × time interaction p < 0.001) and was on average 95 PRU higher (95% CI 41–148; p < 0.001; adjusted for baseline and age); median PRU remained above the high on-treatment reactivity threshold for 4 h. Baseline Multiplate aggregation was lower with ECPR (22 vs. 60 U; p = 0.033), but not after adjustment for platelet count, and did not differ after loading. Major bleeding tended to be more frequent with ECPR (43.8% vs. 15.0%; p = 0.073). Conclusions Enteral ticagrelor provides delayed and attenuated P2Y12 inhibition in ECPR patients, despite a bleeding tendency. Multiplate may underestimate this deficit when platelet counts are low. Rapid-onset, reversible intravenous P2Y12 inhibition warrants evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikuž et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiac arrest undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=36). Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) during enteral ticagrelor therapy vs. Conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation without ECMO during enteral ticagrelor therapy was evaluated on Post-loading P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) measured by VerifyNow assay over 2–48 hours after crushed ticagrelor administration (MD 95 PRU, 95% CI 41–148, p=<0.001). Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with attenuated P2Y12 inhibition after ticagrelor, with average PRU 95 units higher than controls (95% CI 41-148; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: