Background: The gap between positive attitudes toward organic food and actual purchase behaviour remains a puzzle for consumer research. This study asks why some consumers reject organic products despite favourable attitudes, and whether antagonistic and avoidant schemas are associated with this gap. Methods: The sample consisted of 422 adults who completed 20 forced-choice vignettes about organic food scenarios, together with the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI-28), Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), and Social Desirability Scale (SDS-16). A behavioural domain of the VEGA instrument captured narcissistic schemas. Results: The domain showed moderate internal consistency (α = 0.61, ω = 0.63) and a two-factor structure (KMO = 0.73, p < 0.001). Antagonistic schemas were linked to rejection of organic products (r = 0.28, p < 0.001), and criterion validity was supported through behavioural decision-making vignettes (VN-6) (r = 0.28, p < 0.001, n = 360). Social desirability was not associated with the domain (r = 0.04, p = 0.43). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated good absolute fit (RMSEA = 0.039; χ2/df = 1.65) and near-acceptable incremental fit (CFI = 0.83; TLI = 0.81). Conclusions: Behavioural schemas appear to be associated with organic purchases, though the VEGA domain requires further refinement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolotusha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: