Ce:GAGG linear scintillator detectors are promising for high-resolution radiation imaging, but signal sharing near pixel boundaries can affect position resolution. A Geant4 model of a 16 × 1 array was used to assess the lateral pixel dimension (PT), reflector thickness (REF), reflector material, metal interlayer and anti-scatter grid (ASG). The Gaussian-equivalent full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the reconstructed-position distribution and the spatial frequency at 50% modulation transfer (MTF50) were evaluated at central and boundary irradiation positions. PT = 1.0 mm, REF = 0.3 mm and MgO gave a favorable balance between central and boundary responses; the metal interlayer had little influence. A W ASG with 0.60 mm bars and a height of 5.0 mm was selected by comparing total and neighboring-channel energy-deposition tallies in a scattering-phantom geometry. Relative to the reference configuration, the phase-integrated adjacent-channel optical-response fraction decreased from 13.66% to 1.53%, the slanted-edge 10–90% width decreased from 2.951 to 1.876 mm, and the imaging MTF50 point estimate increased from 0.163 to 0.256 cycles mm−1. The integrated recorded optical-photon count decreased by 47.2%. In an ASG-free optical comparison, bar-pattern modulation increased from 0.361 to 0.668. The numerical results apply to the specified simulation and scoring conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: