The twentieth essay in Brainstorming with the Enemy began on the morning of 27 October 2026, with two questions the author put to a machine on his phone: what two thousand years of creating, hiding, managing and destroying double-edged knowledge could teach, and what follows if all knowledge is such an instrument. The machine's clearest finding was that know-how travels in people more than in papers. The author liked the finding, then objected to it: know-how also lives in books, manuals, labels, software, databases and now in AI. The questions and objections are the author's; the history and figures are presented as the machine's input. One running example carries the essay: the Meissen porcelain secret, guarded on paper by Saxony from 1710 and carried to Vienna in 1719 by one of its keepers. The essay proposes a ladder of carriers, each holding more of the doing than the one before, and argues that AI is the first carrier other than a person that fits a rule to a new case, and that it travels like a file. It names what still needs people, contact with the world, someone who answers for the result, and the renewal of what the machines learned from, and rewords the morning's finding: know-how lives in whatever can do the work and notice when it fails. It asks for a loop, not a pipe, between the record, human-led centres of study, machines and the societies that use what they make. It leaves five questions open and gives, as an addendum, the Ladder, with two measures and three predictions and what would refute each. The author also names, without describing it, the research method behind the two runs, which he is building as Wallis, a research assistant that follows every question around a loop he calls the lemniscate. Concepts proposed by the author: the ladder of carriers; the Circulation Axis. Written in part with Claude (Anthropic), an AI model. The ideas, editorial decisions and responsibility for the content are the author's.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel Jacquérioz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: